Sunday, May 22, 2016
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Satanism and Mind Control in the Medical System
Jeanice Barcelo interviewed on Truth Hertz Radio with Charles Giuilani speaking about satanism and mind control in the medical system -- and especially during hospital birth.
Hospitals are Luciferian temples of the occult and the drugs they are giving women, along with every single hospital birth ritual, should be considered sorcery. The evil entities in control of the medical system (Luciferian Jews) are DELIBERATELY inflicting brain-damaging trauma on infants and the repressed memories of this trauma drive human behavior.
This is a deep and important conversation. Please listen and share.
For more info about Jeanice and her work, please visit http://BirthofaNewEarth.com
Sunday, May 15, 2016
"PROGRESSIVE" PROFESSOR URGES WHITE MEN TO COMMIT SUICIDE ON HIS FINAL TEACHING DAY BEFORE RETIREMENT
This is one of the most outrageous pieces of Luciferian Jew FILTH that I have ever read. If, for every time this lying, deceiving professor said the words "white men" we replaced them with the word "JEWS," then we could say he has made an accurate statement. However, in true Luciferian form, everything in this piece of hateful, racist, propaganda is a Luciferian reversal and I am willing to put money on the idea that both the author of the article and the piece of shit professor are both Jews who changed their names to hide their identity. Jews have an agenda to destroy "the white race" and especially white men. And this cowardly piece of filth waited until the last day of his teaching career to expose his racist hatred. Check out this excerpt. Full article below.
“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!” Professor Noel Ignatiev, a tenured professor at Massachusetts College loudly proclaimed to his class last Monday, his final teaching day before retirement."
Source Article By Ivan Fernando
Progressive Professor Urges White Male Students to Commit Suicide During Class
“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!” Professor Noel Ignatiev, a tenured professor at Massachusetts College loudly proclaimed to his class last Monday, his final teaching day before retirement.
The good Professor’s sound and reasonable words resonate with every enlightened and progressive mind. They are indisputable and no one can debate them. They should not be controversial in the slightest, yet remarkably a few far-right extremists object to Prof. Ignatiev’s advice. The Professor however, reported receiving “a standing ovation” from his “largely white and middle class students.” Prof. Ignatiev’s critics say that openly calling for students, even if they are white males, to kill themselves was inappropriate and perhaps excessive. In this article, we will look at the other side of the issue.
Fortunately, I was able to arrange a telephone interview with the professor. I felt he deserved a chance to tell his side of the story. A side that our radical and racist far-right media refuse to report. The transcript of our dialogue follows below:
Ivan Fernando: I want to thank you for agreeing to this interview. It’s a pleasure to be able to talk to an esteemed academic of your calibre and impressive credentials.
Prof. Ignatiev: Thank you. I am happy to talk with you today.
Ivan Fernando: I understand that a few people objected to your advice to your white male students on your last day of teaching. Why do you think that is?
Prof. Ignatiev: I chalk it all up to white supremacist attitudes. The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it. Those who object to my advice, knowingly or perhaps unknowingly, are themselves white supremacists. They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture.
Ivan Fernando: All whites, or just white males should commit suicide?
Prof. Ignatiev: Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities. Besides, some of the brothers like to bang white women. Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide. It’s the right thing to do. Let me read you an e-mail that I received today from a xenophobic white-supremacist.
“I’m not a racist, in fact I am an avowed anti-racist, I just think calling for all white males to kill themselves is extreme. When you say that every white person is bad or advocate violence against them, it sounds almost as though you are becoming a kind of racist yourself. You say it is good for everyone to be proud of their culture. Blacks, Mexicans and everyone else. Why should whites be the only exception? For the sake of argument, supposing whites have wronged many other races historically. Should we punish people today for their ancestor’s sins? Today minorities have affirmative action and generous social welfare programs to protect them. Can we really say that most whites are racist now or that the government is? Should Blacks who descend from Blacks who owned or sold slaves feel guilty and be punished for ancestral wrongs?”
Ivan Fernando: Wow. (laughter)
Prof. Ignatiev: I know, mind boggling. What an absurd and irrational line of reasoning. They just throw logic out the window entirely. It’s impossible to dialogue with these people. Notice the blind and irrational hatred behind every word! No one has committed violence, genocide and dispossession on the level of white males. The whole purpose of white male culture is to perpetuate their privileged status and continue their oppression of non-whites. Whites don’t have a culture like other races in which traditions and customs are preserved as an expression of a common identity. White culture is an entirely economic and social culture which is about shutting out other people deemed “non-white” as a means of preventing their social and economic advancement! In other words all of ‘white culture’ so-called, stems from hatred of the other, unlike other ethnicities which do have cultures. White people are a disease, they are parasites! They don’t deserve to live!
Ivan Fernando: Yes, Absolutely, could you give us some examples though for our readers, regarding the racist nature of white culture.
Prof. Ignatiev: Columbus Day, whites literally celebrate the genocide of non-whites, delighting in it. Thanksgiving Day. Whites honour the Pilgrims who gave Native Americans blankets deliberately infected with small pox to kill their babies. Yeah, it is about being thankful, thankful that whites butchered most Native Americans so they could steal their land and establish a racist society based on white male privilege! Christmas is also racist. Should I go on?
Ivan Fernando: Please do.
Prof. Ignatiev: The idea of celebrating the birth of a middle eastern Semite, yet portraying him as a Nordic white person in visual art is not only racist, but obscene and Anti-Semitic! Of course there is Santa Claus as well. Who is he? A bearded old white man! He lives at the North Pole, it doesn’t get whiter than that! Who works for Santa? Of course elves, diminutive, perhaps slightly brown people, with pointed ears who have been enslaved by a privileged white male. Christmas and white culture disgust me. I hate this time of year so much. I hate going outside and seeing Christmas trees or Christmas lights. They should be banned! A Christmas tree is just one notch above a burning cross in my opinion!
Ivan Fernando: What do you suggest that people do for the holidays. Especially, minority families who may feel pressured to celebrate Christmas, or other European racist holidays? Is there an alternative?
Prof Ignatiev: A great Black Professor in the 60’s came up with Kwanza, a way to celebrate African heritage. Hopefully a Mexican-American equivalent will soon be developed as another Christmas alternative.
Ivan Fernando: I am sorry, but we are starting to run low on time. Let me ask you, have you suffered any attacks personally, or received any threats for your advice to your students during your final class?
Prof. Ignatiev: (laughter) No. I haven’t. In fact all the responses I have received, except for a few e-mails have been positive. I feel vindicated. Perhaps we are finally coming to an awareness in this country that the cancer known as the white race must be obliterated. Especially in the form of white males. Obama is president, and I think there is an excellent chance that we will never have a white male president again. I think we are witnessing the breaking of the back of the white male power structure. We will still have residual white males that must be dealt with, but I am confident that we’ve won. Eventually, I would like to put white males in concentration camps and work them to death just like they’ve done to everyone else. When they are all dead we can throw a party and dance around their corpses!
Ivan Fernando: I certainly hope so. I hope you are right. If so it is the dawning of a new era of peace and progress. I apologize Professor, but we are out of time now. Thank you again, and it was a pleasure speaking with you.
Prof Ignatiev. The pleasure was mine. Thank you Ivan. I love Diversity Chronicle by the way, I recommended it to all my students. Keep up the good work!
Ivan Fernando: You are very kind Prof. Ignatiev. Thank you again and Good night.
Prof. Ignatiev: Good Night.
Copyright © 2013 Diversity Chronicle All Rights Reserved.
Sunday, May 8, 2016
In addition to the obvious gender-bending going on in this article, it is also a mind-bender. In fact, that is what the entire transgender movement is about -- bending and shaping the minds of young people, distorting their understanding of themselves and Creation, breaking down their natural inclinations and identity, and tearing asunder God's natural laws.
Luciferian Jews are attempting to mainstream this filth and perversion, but I'm willing to bet they will not succeed. Rather, what they are doing will cause a backlash against all Jews, including those who are innocent, and instigate another expulsion from yet another country.
Keep going you morons. You are only hurting yourselves.
Within evil lies the seed of its own destruction.
Jews: Sexually Perverted ~ and Remaking Society in Their Image
ED Noor: After reading the following, please see: Radical Homosexual Movement Run by Jews . Basically this piece explores deviancy, as dealt with in the Talmud. Of course the “bragging” regarding inclusion from the Times of Israel has left yours truly with a roiling tummy; this material is just that deranged. The rabbinical portion is informational, not that it makes the topic any easier to digest. I am also going to ad that recently Israel partnered with an American PR firm to infiltrate and work with, among others, trans youth considered to be a fragile and impressionable segment of society. Apparently these young are beginning to openly relate to the suffering and isolation of the Palestinians and this does bother Israel…..
Another recommended read: The ‘Queering of Leviticus,’ or How a Rabbi Permits Gay Sex
So here we have two Israeli men who are officially a child’s biological fathers, a male rabbi born a woman, and a genderqueer rocker talk about life as they know it. Personally, I am prone to go with DNA having the final word on one’s gender but then, what does a mere Western gentile know about these matters when up against those great rabbinical minds who can even defeat God in a discussion?
By Orli Santo
Source: Times of Israel, Originally posted September 25, 2013
NOTE by Chris Rossetti: Just as Jews tend to remake the societies they invade into mirrors of the multiracial, multicultural cesspools in which they evolved, so also they instinctively attempt to mold their host societies to match the high levels of sex perversion naturally present among Jews. Jews are far more likely to be homosexual than non-Jews, for but one example among many. As the two articles ~ from Jewish sources ~ excerpted below show, Jews have historically recognized and tolerated a number of bizarre sexual categories.
They are clearly infecting us with their own long-term psychosexual illnesses, which are today illustrated by such repulsive manifestations as Yuval Topper ~“born female [and who] underwent a sex reassignment surgery to become male, discovered that he’s gay, married a gay man, and …became the first Israeli transgender man to conceive and give birth to a baby” ~ and the “the all-transgender, all-Jewish, folk punk band called Schmekel.”
In the second article quoted below, from the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, the Jewish author justifies what I believe is biological, instinctive behavior in “scriptural” terms.
What we are witnessing here is a type of evolutionary competition in which a species or subspecies (in this case, Jews) modifies its current environment to more closely resemble one in which it has thrived (multiculturalism, multiracialism, pervasive sex perversion) but in which its competitors (Whites) cannot thrive and are weakened. Jews do not all necessarily do this consciously (though many are intelligent enough to see this pattern in themselves, I am sure). But that they are doing it is, in my view, indisputable.
* * *
Transgender? Judaism’s got a blessing for you
This is an era of gender revolutions, and the Jewish community is racing to keep up. Enter Yuval Topper. Topper, who comes from an Orthodox family, was born female, underwent a sex reassignment surgery to become male, discovered that he’s gay, married a gay man, and in 2011 became the first Israeli transgender man to conceive and give birth to a baby.
Last week, following nearly two years of struggles, Israel’s Interior Ministry begrudgingly recognized both men as the child’s biological parents ~ another big first.
Granted, it’s a lot to take in. But Rabbi Elliot Kukla, above, a leading Jewish educator on LGBT rights, says this is nothing new. Rabbi Elliot Kukla, is a female Jew who lives as a male.
“There’s a growing number of trans-male Jews who are getting pregnant and having babies. Finding ways to sanctify and welcome men who are having babies into the community, which is something previous generations of Jews could never dream of, is increasingly becoming part of modern Jewish life,” Kukla tells the Times of Israel.
The past decade has been hugely transformative for LGBT Jews. But while lesbian, gay, and bisexual people have become fairly well-integrated into most aspects of non-Orthodox Jewish life, inclusion of transgender Jews is still in its early stages.
The Reform and Reconstructionist movements have begun programs for transgender inclusion, the Conservative Movement is discussing creating more open policies, but transgender Jews are still struggling for acceptance and understanding.
‘Finding ways to sanctify and welcome men who are having babies into the community is increasingly becoming part of modern Jewish life’
“People tend to like having things in nice, tidy boxes, of men do this, and women do that, and challenging these notions can create anxieties,” explains Kukla. “To make room for transgender Jews round the table, we have to expand some of our notions around gender and sexuality. For starters, normalizing the fact that people can have different life-cycles and choices, ones that don’t necessarily conform to the binary reality of male/female, mother/father… to my understanding, gender is a lot more complex than that.”
In 2006, Kukla became the first openly transgender man to be ordained by the Reform movement. In 2007, he wrote the first blessing sanctifying the sex-change process to be included in Kulanu, the manual for LGBT inclusion. He is also the co-creator of Trans-Torah, a body of existing and new Jewish sources that speak to the experience of being a Trans-Jew, which includes texts for a Pre-Surgery Mikveh Ritual, Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Wedding Services, A Blessing for Chest Binding, and more.
As awareness grows, the rituals are being adopted by mainstream synagogues as well: Kukla says he was recently contacted by large temple in Los Angeles that wanted to hold a re-naming ceremony for a teenager coming out as a transgender man, two years after celebrating his bat mitzvah.
…Judaism remained a constant in Itai Gal’s life, even as nearly everything else changed. Gal, 28, a transgender man, was born in Israel and grew up in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, in a Modern Orthodox community. He underwent sex reassignment therapy in his early twenties, and during his transformation congregations such as Bet Simchat Torah (New York’s LGBT synagogue) provided a welcoming space.
Gal, currently studying for a masters degree in Jewish education, is observant “but in a way that gives me freedom to make decisions based on my own life experience.”
Gal ~ whose stage name is Ricky Riot ~ is also a member of the all-transgender, all-Jewish, folk punk band called Schmekel.
“Mixing traditional klezmer scales with punk sensibilities, Schmekel [which means “little penis” in Yiddish] challenges listeners to think critically about Judaism, queerness, and the sounds that accompany both,” states the band on its homepage.
The band’s four members were born female but now identify themselves on the masculine side of the gender spectrum: the band’s drummer, Simcha Halpert-Hanson, identifies as genderqueer and thus outside of a recognizable gender.
Instead of “he” or “she” Halpert-Hanson is referred to as “they.”
Though Schmekel’s lyrics often relate to the painful and difficult experiences of transition, they keep their sense of humor.
Noor: These four “artistes” expressing their Distinctly Jewish “sense of humour”. Note the Haman’s Ears. The titles of some of their extremely deviant songs are too obscene for me to repeat here.
If they find out that I’m trans/ They don’t recognize me with tzitzis and pants / Even though I have a beard and spectacles / They won’t hold my hand if I don’t have a schmekticle,” goes a song from Schmekel’s new album, “The Whale That Ate Jonah,” to be released this October.
While there’s growing awareness and understanding of transgender and gender variants on the liberal end of Judaism, says Gal, Orthodoxy remains a problem.
“Not everybody is privileged enough to be in this liberal Jewish community, where they have to worry about things like people using the right pronouns. There are still young people whose families disown them, or tell them they are not who they say they are, and send them to correctional programs,” says Gal.
For Topper, born as the only daughter to an Orthodox family of six in Jerusalem, Orthodoxy’s strict gender roles proved impossible.
“From early on, he was always unhappy,” his mother recalls in a TV interview with the Israeli channel Keshet.
Feeling chronically misplaced, at age 12 Topper convinced his parents to transfer him to a secular school ~ it was a relief, but something still felt wrong, he said. This nagging feeling persisted even after he came out of the closet as a lesbian at age 16.
“This was hard to accept,” continues his mother. “Being a religious family, we were worried about the community’s response; also, when a parent is happy with his own way of life, he wants the same for his kid.”
At age 18, Topper realized that what he wanted was to be a man. With his parents’ insistence, he began seeing a therapist, who explained the essentials of transgenderism. At the age of 20 he began hormonal treatment, and a few months later, in 2008, followed up with breast removal surgery.
“When they took off the bandages… I saw my chest was entirely flat: it was one of the most amazing moments of my life. The first days I just wanted to jump for joy, that I really did it, that it was really over,” he wrote in his blog.
With hormones, his sexual orientation changed, and he began taking an interest in men. The year of his operation he met Matan Topper-Erez, his future husband. In 2010, they married, twice — first in a private ceremony for the family and again in a civil ceremony in Toronto. Neither was acknowledged by the State of Israel.
Topper’s decision to get pregnant was one of simple practicality: In line with the rabbinical courts, the State of Israel does not officially allow same-sex couples to adopt….
Yuval Topper-Erez (left), husband Matan and their son. (photo credit: courtesy)
On December 28, 2011, Topper gave birth to his first-born son, Liri.
But that was just the beginning of the couple’s struggles: Israel’s Interior Ministry refused to register Matan as Liri’s biological father so long as Yuval Topper was also registered as a man.
Only last week, with the direct intervention of Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar and chairman of the Knesset Interior Committee MK Miri Regev, did the Ministry give in.
Though the decision to recognize both men as the biological parents is largely touted by the media as a groundbreaking precedent, the couple clarifies that it was more a bureaucratic sleight of hand.
“Yuval has not been recognized simply as a second father as the [news] publications mentioned. Rather, his sex had been changed back to female, he was registered in the baby’s birth certificate as the mother, and then his sex was changed back to male,” Matan Topper-Erez tells the Times of Israel. “This complex process was not what we would have wanted… We accepted that solution, however, because the baby was already over one and a half years-old, and I was not registered as a parent.”
* * *
Understanding Transgender Issues in Jewish Ethics
The dominant approach to gender in Western society has its origin in Christian thought that understands both sex and gender as binary. In that understanding, everyone is either male or female, and gender and sex are identical. While Jews gradually absorbed that perspective, classical rabbinic Judaism had a much more sophisticated understanding.
The Talmud contains hundreds of references to other categories. These include, for example, the androgynos (a hermaphrodite with male and female organs), the tumtum (someone with hidden or underdeveloped genitalia), the eylonit (a masculine woman) and the saris (a feminine man). It is clear from even this short list that the Talmud recognizes that sex organs do not necessarily make people purely male or purely female. The Talmud also recognizes that an individual’s gender orientation does not necessarily match his or her sex organs.
And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. (Genesis 1;27)
This perspective is underlined by the Mishna: “The androgynos is like a man in some ways and like a woman in some ways, like both a man and a woman in some ways, and like neither a man nor a woman in some ways.” (Bikurim 4.1) While the talmudic rabbis did not know about chromosomes or hormones, they certainly understood that sex and gender are independent variables, and they made it licit for people to be true to themselves in regard to gender expression.
In reaching this stance, the rabbis had to deal with several aspects of the Torah’s teaching that seem to dictate a different position. One of these aspects is the Torah’s prohibition of cross-dressing (Deuteronomy 22:5). The Talmud says that what is prohibited is falsifying identity for the purpose of spying on the other sex. The great medieval commentator Rashi says that the prohibition is limited to concealing identity for the purpose of adultery. The Shulhan Arukh notes that cross-dressing is permitted on Purim because its purpose is simha (celebration, joy) and that it is forbidden if it is for the purpose of fraud. In limiting the prohibition to situations of fraud and deception, the talmudic and medieval rabbis indicated that cross-dressing in a way that is true to the cross-dresser’s identity is permitted.
The other biblical prohibition is of castration. Of course, this is irrelevant for female-to-male transgender people. Most male-to-female transgender people do not have “bottom surgery,” in which case it is not an issue for them either. Contemporary Jewish bioethicists treat vasectomy as an equivalent of castration, so for those who would allow vasectomy, voluntary castration should be treated similarly.
In terms of contemporary Jewish ethics, several key values are relevant to this issue ~ inclusion, tzedek (justice), and briyut (health). People who wish to be included in our Jewish community should be warmly welcomed. In the spirit of every person being b’tzelem Elohim (in the image of God), their diversity should be understood as adding to the divine presence among us.
In a world where tzedek is often withheld from people for reasons of class, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation and family structure, among other reasons, it is incumbent upon Jews to fight injustice in all its forms. “We were slaves in Egypt.” Transgender people, subject to many kinds of injustice, deserve our support.
Briyut is concerned with both physical and emotional health. Preventing individuals from expressing who they are clearly leads to psychological problems. The mitzvah of healing is not limited to health professionals; it is incumbent upon every Jew. Supporting transgender people in who they are is part of that mitzvah.
…Our current understanding differentiates among sex, sexual orientation and gender as three independent variables that can appear in individuals in any combination. Given that reality, it is important to allow individuals to name and describe themselves.
There are several basic measures that Jewish communities should take. They should include transgender people in their nondiscrimination policies, including employment policies. To avoid embarrassment for transgender people, buildings should have at least one single-stall restroom and notices near other restrooms giving the location of the single-stall restroom. Programming to help people come to terms with the issues raised above should be a regular part of Jewish communal life.
The mitzvah that takes precedence over virtually all others is saving a life. In a world where sexual minorities are subject to ridicule and suicide, we all need to stand up for the full diversity in our communities.
* * *
Source: Times of Israel and Reconstructionist Rabbinical College
Jewish TV writer JENJI KOHAN (left), flanked by sexual exhibitionist Miley Cyrus
Source Article by Dr. Lasha Darkmoon
Mind Pollution — The Promotion of Sexual Perversion on National TV: The Case of Jenji Kohan
“Fie, fie, fie, pah, pah! — Give me an ounce of civet, good apothecary, to sweeten my imagination.”
— King Lear, Act 4, Scene 6
Some would argue that this is not about the pollution of minds. They would maintain that there is no deliberate attempt to undermine the morals of a virtuous nation, still less the morals of its innocent minors. It’s more fundamental than that.
This is simply a question, they would point out, of a bunch of dirty-minded writers and degenerate TV executives getting together to produce buckets of sleaze for an increasingly debased public. Depravity, they would tell us, is not being systematically manufactured: it is the natural flatulence of filthy minds. It is the foul atmosphere around us, the very air we breathe. We are filthy, stewed and marinated in filth like dung flies, and filth is what we naturally produce.
Let’s examine this interesting thesis.
Jenji Kohan (b. 1969), a radical feminist and devout follower of Judaism, is a popular American TV scriptwriter. What I find truly astonishing about this Jewish lady, who enjoys eating Shabbat dinner with her extended family every Friday at her house and attends two different synagogues, is that she has managed to combine religious piety with the promotion of sexual perversion.
She has openly stated on more than one occasion that sexual perversion is normal and healthy. Hence she has no problem promoting it on American TV. After all, if sexual perversion is “good clean fun”, why not spread the happiness around and help nice American families savor the joys of incest, bestiality and other assorted paraphilias?
In a riveting article for the Occidental Observer, Brenton Sanderson explains that Kohan echoes the Freudian argument that “a disposition to perversions is an original and universal disposition of the human sexual instinct.”
Translated into the simplest English: we’re all pervs. Au fond: at bottom, when you strip away all the frills and get down to the nitty-gritty. As for chastity, female modesty, sexual decency, these are all later accretions or artificial developments that violate our essential natures or primitive instincts. A million years ago—when Stone Age humans were grappling with saber-toothed tigers and committing arson by rubbing dry sticks together, and life, according to Thomas Hobbes, was “nasty, brutish and short”—in those long ago times, rape and murder, bestiality and incest, were thrilling everyday events. Ever since then alas, it’s been steadily downhill all the way, until now we have —horror of horrors!— Western civilization.
Thus, in a nutshell, the philosophy of Freud and his kinky commissars.
In her scripts for American TV, Kohan has no inhibitions about dishing up generous portions of sexual perversion. Incest, for example, is openly (though subtly) promoted by the use of humor. In one episode of her show Weeds, the main character Nancy is shown tearing up nude photos of herself and flushing them down the toilet. This is because she has caught her son Shane masturbating over them. In a prurient 3-minute scene, Nancy is shown lecturing her son on the inadvisability of masturbating over her.
“It’s a little quirky to masturbate over pictures of your mother,” she chides him gently, her voice oozing with sanctimonious concern for his moral welfare. She suggests that it is “possibly” wrong that he should masturbate over his mother’s image, throwing in a trendy reference to the omniscient Freud.
Yes, Papa Sigmund would have understood and offered absolution for her son’s incestuous feelings that are (allegedly) universal. All part of the growing up process, you understand.
Nancy advises her son to continue masturbating by all means but to seek out a more appropriate object for his sexual ardor. Like the girl next door. Or a Playboy model. “It’s nothing terrible or unnatural! Sex is good, Freud said. Or Annie Sprinkle maybe” (re Sprinkle, see my “Sex and the Jews“). But hey, jerking off over his mom, that’s a bit “quirky”, isn’t it? Mothers, after all, are “possibly” unsuitable objects for filial passion. This all too obvious tongue-in-cheek prurience tries to pass itself off as cutting-edge sociological comment. If you object, you are obviously a Victorian prude.
Hey, lighten up man!—where’s your goddamn sense of humor?
Right. So this is the point we’ve reached. Sons being given pep talks on incestuous masturbation by their mothers is now, on American TV at any rate, a normal, everyday episode in a healthy mother-son relationship. This is something that would have been inconceivable to our Christian ancestors only fifty years ago; and it is still inconceivable in many parts of the world where moral standards have managed to survive and sexual decency is still valued. The scene is played for laughs, and the actress playing Nancy sounds pretty much like Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman trying her best to keep a straight face as she does a comic skit involving “sexual abuse” of her pet dog, apparently licking her dog’s anus—much to the horror of some passer-by who witnesses the “hilarious scene” and reports it to the cops.
We are clearly expected to view the mother-son incest scene in Kohan’s Weeds in a similarly tolerant, laid-back light. This is meant to be seen as as a touchingly amusing vignette of family life in the early 21st century: an example of quirky, cutting-edge “Jewish humor” at its ribald, irreverent, life-enhancing best.
You don’t have to be a genius to know what is going on here. Sexual perversion is being normalized. And humor is being used as a corrupting agent to make it all seem palatable, trendy and cool. You are made to feel guilty if you don’t find incest funny. And if do find it funny and give way to mirth, you have taken the first step down the slippery slope into degeneracy by trivializing sexual deviance and minimizing its moral turpitude.
In case you don’t believe me, here is the 3-minute Weeds video:
Weeds - sex w/ our mothers talk
Maybe you found that little scene amusing? Maybe you’re wondering why I’m kicking up such a fuss about what tens of thousands of Americans are likely to find perfectly innocuous.
If so, you are part of the problem. You are not using your imagination. Ask yourself: is this sort of thing fit for family viewing? Imagine a nice American family—father, mother, son, daughter—watching this incest scene after dinner. How do you think the teenage son is going to feel about his mother? I’m willing to bet the entire family will be squirming with embarrassment in their seats, doing their best to hide their blushes.
Two things I can tell you for sure. Firstly, if that family are not acutely embarrassed, they’re abnormal. They’ve already lost the plot. Secondly, if they continue to watch this disgusting filth and chuckle over it like morons, pretending it’s hilarious and groovy. they are past redemption. Hopeless cases. They might as well hang themselves.
As for the guys who run American TV and manufacture this moral halitosis for the masses, they already are dead. They are the Walking Dead. How these people ever got into the topmost echelons of the entertainment industry is a mystery to me.
I guess the devil rules the world and looks after his own.
In the estimation of the Jewish Journal, Kohan is a “provocative, controversial” writer who has the guts to tackle dark themes and paddle bravely in foul waters. “No topic is too grim,” the Jewish Journal notes matter-of-factly, “no character too depraved.”
Time magazine is equally complimentary, calling Kohan a “force of nature” and lauding her for her genius in being able to depict shady characters who are “a breathtaking riot of color and [diverse] sexual orientation … characters of all backgrounds who are three-dimensional, flawed and sometimes unpleasant, but always human.” The fact that these breathtakingly colorful characters are also twisted and perverted, infecting the minds of millions with the virus of their depraved values, does not appear to trouble the Time magazine reviewer. He is probably a fellow club member, supping at the same table of tainted meats.
Kohan’s malign influence on American TV can hardly be exaggerated. She is all over the place. She has written numerous TV dramas and comedies, including Sex and the City, Gilmore Girls, Mad About You, and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. Every show mentioned above is a product of the Jewish imagination: Jewish writers, Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors. For example, Sex and the City was created by Jewish writer, director and producer Darren Star; Gilmore Girls by Jewish writer, director and producer Andy Sherman; Mad About You by Jewish writer and actor Paul Reiser and Jewish writer and producer Danny Jacobson; and, finally, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air by Jewish writer and actor Andy Borowitz and his wife Susan Borowitz. (See here.)
If this isn’t Jewish over-representation, what is it? Non-Jewish America is having Jewish values thrust down its collective throat, willy-nilly. It is being permeated, whether it likes it or not, by jüdischer Geist (the “Jewish spirit”).
Not all the shows mentioned above are as subversively kinky as the shows in which Jenji Kohan is personally involved, such as Weeds and Orange is the New Black. It is to be noted, however, that Kohan’s eldest brother David—whom she considers, incidentally, as rather “tame” compared to herself (see below)—has been the single most important influence in America for the promotion of homosexuality on TV. David Kohan was the co-creator and producer of the hugely influential gay-themed sitcom Will & Grace. It was none other than Vice President Joe Biden who in 2013 openly acknowledged David Kohan’s seminal influence in casting a veil of glamor over homosexuality:
It wasn’t anything we legislatively did,” Biden said. “It was Will & Grace. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. I bet you 85 percent of those changes are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.
Commenting on the point made by Biden, liberal Jewish columnist Jonathan Chait alludes mysteriously to a “vast left-wing conspiracy on your screen,” without bothering to clarify what ethnic group is in the forefront of activating and promoting this “vast left-wing conspiracy.” Agreeing with Biden that Will & Grace was “the single most important driving force in transforming public opinion on the subject [of homosexual relationships]”, Chait adds significantly, driving home the point I am trying to make here:
“Think of it from the conservative point of view. Imagine that large chunks of your entertainment mocked your values and even transformed once-uncontroversial beliefs of yours into a kind of bigotry that might be greeted with revulsion. You’d probably be angry, too.”
Yes, so don’t blame me if I’m angry. Anger is the only possible reaction to this outrageous onslaught on the traditional values of my Christian ancestors, the values I cherish. For the concerted Jewish attempt to normalize homosexuality, turning what was once widely seen as a mental sickness into a trendy alternative lifestyle, see this excellent article by Brenton Sanderson: “The Indoctrination Game, Part 2: Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive culture of homosexuality.”
The ubiquity of Jews in the entertainment industry, as well as their “debauching” influence on the American psyche, has been freely admitted even by Jewish writers. Thus Adam Garfinkle, Jewish author and founding editor of The American Interest, points out in his 1990 book Jewcentricity:
“It is striking, one has to admit, that the cultural influence of Jews and Jewishness is what it is, considering that fewer than 5 million American Jews are influencing more than 296 million other Americans.” Noting the “increasingly salacious content of mass media”, he adds significantly,“There are Jews at every turn, in marketing, in media, and, of course, in the entertainment business itself. It does not take a rocket scientist to connect the dots: liberals are responsible for the dangerous debauching of our society, not least through vapid entertainment-culture garbage, and a disproportionate number of liberals who are doing precisely that are Jews. (Emphasis added, quoted here)
It seems nonsensical to assert, in the context of this candid admission by a prominent American Jew that Jews are largely to blame for the corruption of America, that what America needs right now is a greater infusion of “Jewish values”—whatever that’s supposed to mean. And yet this is precisely what Rabbi Shmuley Boteach preaches: that what non-Jewish Americans badly need right now is to be “healed” by the adoption of “Jewish values.”
The rabbi, renowned for his bestselling sex books with flashy titles like The Jewish Guide to Adultery and Kosher Lust: Love Is Not the Answer is precisely the type of rabbi whom Jenji Kohan would enthusiastically endorse. But how their shared “Jewish values” would benefit the rest of non-Jewish America is not altogether clear.
“Lust is the pinnacle of holiness,” Rabbi Shmuley pontificates absurdly in one of his popular sex manuals. “If you put love and lust together, love stands no chance.”
SEX-MAD RABBI SHMULEY BOTEACH
“Lust is the pinnacle of holiness.”
I am not aware that even the Talmud says that lust is the pinnacle of holiness. The Old Testament certainly does not. This “philosophy of lust”, if we can call it that, so familiar to readers of the Marquis de Sade, is Kohan’s philosophy too and informs all her thought. Lust runs rampant through her scripts, rearing its head everywhere—even in Christian churches where nuns achieve “the pinnacle of holiness” through fellatio.
In Kohan’s bizarro fantasy world, almost every female in American female prisons—as in Orange is the New Black — is involved in steamy lesbian affairs with other female inmates. Characters take bets to see which of them can seduce the largest number of non-lesbian inmates. Let the camera enter a Christian church, as in Californication, and pan to a nun in her modest clerical robes. In no time at all, this demure devotee of Jesus Christ is shown going down on her knees—not to pray as you might expect—but to dispense oral sex to a stranger who has just dropped into the church to seek help for his sex problems.
The good sister advises him that what he needs is a blowjob. That will cheer him up a bit.
The whole scene is apparently a “fantasy”—which is supposed to make it more acceptable, because it’s not really happening except in the writer’s mind. But why do Jewish writers insist on locating their sexual fantasies—or the sexual fantasies of their characters — in Christian churches rather than in synagogues? I am asking, basically: if you are a Jewish writer, why pick on a Catholic church for a blowjob scene? Why not locate your fantasy in a synagogue? Are we expected to believe that blowjob scenes never take place in synagogues, only in wicked Catholic churches?
This 3-minute video, “A Blowjob in Church”, will show you what is being done to Christian America and its culture by sexually perverted Jewish writers whose fame is out of all proportions to their talents.
A blowjob in Church
Ask yourself: how many sons masturbate over their mother’s nude photos? How many nuns fellate men in Catholic churches? The fact that these images are allowed to fester like poisonous weeds in the rich soil of the mass mind must give us cause for concern. This is mind pollution on a staggering scale.
Here is the illiterate YouTube introduction to this nasty little scene set in a Catholic church: “Church is a holy place for christians (sic) when they confess of sin (sic) not commit sin but in this video you see how the christian actor and actress is (sic) making fun of their own religion. So first look at your own self then blame others ok.”
Beautiful. Talk about sly and sneaky disinformation! The fact that the actor playing the “sinful” Christian in the scene is in fact a Jew, a debauched looking specimen called David Duchovny (pictured here), is conveniently concealed—apart from the fact that the entire series is a product of the sleazy Jewish imagination: Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors, Jewish scriptwriters.
— § —
“I want fucking all the time,” Kohan gushes in an interview. “That’s one of my things. We’re all doing it. We’re all thinking about it. We don’t see it enough. It’s hot. I love the sex stuff, and I want more. I love graphic sex, the more sex the better.” (For more details, see here)
Brenton Sanderson notes:
‘Orange is the New Black’ is an incredibly degenerate show that inverts traditional Western morality and glamorizes homosexuality. The main themes of the show are that committed heterosexual relationships are abnormal and that Christianity is an evil creed….Every woman in the prison, with the exception of the Christian villain, is in a lesbian relationship with one of their fellow inmates — even a nun. Hollywood’s Jewish movers and shakers love to debase Christianity and Catholicism by depicting nuns in sexual roles…. This pornographic debasement of Christian symbols by Jews is a blatant way of defiling Christian culture. (Emphasis added)
Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein, deceased publisher of Screw magazine, uses almost identical words — see here — so Brenton Sanderson is not saying anything outrageously controversial. He is merely stating the facts. According to one source, Kohan has succeeded in normalizing sexual perversion.
For my part, I find all this kinky sex incomprehensible, given that Kohan claims to be a devout follower of Judaism.
We are told that she had toyed with the idea of becoming a rabbi at one time and now attends two separate synagogues, as I have already noted above. Every Friday Kohan and her extended family have Shabbat dinner together. Her elder brother David, co-creator and producer of the gay-themed NBC sitcom Will & Grace, often attends these semi-religious meals at her house. Kohan dismisses his brand of homosexual humor as too tame for her, explaining, “I was always a little darker.”
She says her pornographic scripts help her to get in touch with her Jewish identity. “For me, the essence of my Judaism is to ask questions. In a way, the show allows me to follow the path of Judaism.”
JEWISH TV WRITER JENJI KOHAN: “I want fucking all the time.”
I confess I am at a complete loss to understand any of this. It is totally beyond my comprehension to understand how two allegedly pious Jews, brother and sister, are both regular synagogue attendees and yet earn their respective livings by writing salacious TV scripts that openly promote and seek to normalize sexual perversion.
I can’t help wondering if all this ostensible piety is genuine or just camouflage. Do we really have a nice, synagogue-going lady here, doing her best to access deeper levels of spirituality that allow her “to follow the path of Judaism”, or is all this just cant and sanctimonious twaddle put on for our benefit by a lady who wants “fucking all the time” — a rather pathetic, unattractive, sex-crazed sleazebucket?
It is not for me to judge.
Jenji Kohan and her kind are just the tip of a giant iceberg. They are a small part of a vast underground sewer of filth that befouls the air of American TV — a media empire that now exports its unsavory products to all other parts of the world, infecting the minds of millions in many lands.
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Well, somebody had to do it. An Israeli man has filed for a restraining order against the psychopathic Israeli god. I suppose it was only a matter of time, seeing as how this insane entity requires his mind-controlled followers to cut off the most sensitive part of their infant sons's penis to create a covenant with him...
and repeatedly demands that people offer up their first born children (and animals) to him...
the same god that commands that animals be sacrificed to him...
and enjoys the scent of burning flesh...
and even teaches his followers how to torture, murder, collect (and consume) the blood of sacrificed animals...
Without a doubt, the Jewish god is the universe's worst kind of demon, so it is good that someone has finally gotten a restraining order to stop his psychopathic presence in their lives.
Israeli Man Seeks Restraining Order Against God
and repeatedly demands that people offer up their first born children (and animals) to him...
the same god that commands that animals be sacrificed to him...
and enjoys the scent of burning flesh...
and even teaches his followers how to torture, murder, collect (and consume) the blood of sacrificed animals...
Without a doubt, the Jewish god is the universe's worst kind of demon, so it is good that someone has finally gotten a restraining order to stop his psychopathic presence in their lives.
Israeli Man Seeks Restraining Order Against God
An Israeli man has launched a campaign to stop God interfering in his life after three years of poor treatment at the hands of the Almighty.
The unidentified man submitted a restraining order request against His Holiness at an Israeli court on Tuesday.
He said that God had been bothering him for three years and that repeated requests to the police had been ignored, with the authorities only sending patrol cars to his home on 10 occasions and not taking his calls seriously.
Authorities eventually told the man to take out a restraining order against the Lord, he said, so he duly obliged at the Magistrate Court in the northern Israeli port city of Haifa.
“For the past three years He started to treat me harshly and not nicely. I complained to the police many times. The Israel police asked me to take out a restraining order,” the man said in the proceedings at the court, according to Israeli news site NRG.
God appeared to take note of the man’s complaints as the document of the court proceedings, published after the restraining order request, noted that He did not present himself at the hearing.
The ruling judge, Ahsan Canaan, threw the request out of court, saying that the attempt was absurd and that he should seek help elsewhere and not from the local authorities, The Times of Israel reported.
God was not immediately available for comment.
To anyone with a clear thinking mind, it should be a no-brainer to understand that it is not a good idea to smash your breasts inside a device that will send radioactive waves into the body. However, because we have so many mind-controlled zombies on our planet, women have, for decades now, REPEATEDLY let the medical system irradiate their breasts under the guise of "preventive medicine."
You cannot make this shit up folks. It's really happening.
Study Concludes That Mammography Is Harmful & Should Be Abandoned
A new study on mammography conducted by Peter C Gøtzsche, of the Nordic Cochrane Centre and published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, shows that the practice of breast irradiation in an attempt to ‘protect’ against breast cancer is not only harmful but should be abandoned.
The study entitled “Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned,” shows that decades of screening has done nothing to reduce breast cancer mortality. This is despite the fact that millions of new and supposedly “early stage” or “stage zero” cancers are being diagnosed, which inflate survival rates.
Natural Society reports:
Previous research by the same author has concluded that even up to 52% of women undergoing this form of breast screening as recommended will be over-diagnosed; however it is hoped that as many of these women as possible obtain a second opinion.
Another study, more readily available as it was published in 2012, examined the incidence of breast cancer across a 32-year timespan, of both localized cancers and later-stage disease. They found that the introduction of mammography in the US was associated with an increase in early stage breast cancer, from 112 to 234 cases per 100,000 women.
In addition, the rate of late-stage breast cancer decreased by only about 8%, from 102 to 94 cases per 100,000. Assuming the best of mammography, 8 of the 122 new cases were women who had been saved by screening and not other factors such as a reduction in smoking rates.
After adjustment, the authors then estimated an over-diagnosis – that is tumors that would have never cause clinical problems – in 1.3 million women during the years 1976 to 2008. In 2008 alone, over 70,000 women were over-diagnosed; this was 31% of all breast cancers diagnosed.
How many of these women will develop “true” cancers from the overprescribed radiation (and chemo), how many will develop, or already suffer from, other physical and mental health issues? The psychological effects of a cancer diagnosis include clinical mental illness and even suicide. Based on data from over 6 million people, a positive cancer diagnosis raises suicide risk 12 times over in the first week and by 3 times in the first year.
Radiation Could ‘Make Cancer Even Stronger’ [no shit Sherlock!]
The risk of cardiovascular-related death is increased by 5.6 times in the first week, and 3.3 times in the first 4 weeks. Additionally, radiation as a cancer “treatment” may increase the survival and renewing abilities of the cells responsible for breast cancer growth by up to 30 times! This means that an unnatural natural selection process may take place, where weaker cancer cells are killed off and the more menacing populations are enriched.
However, the lower-dose radiation used in mammography has actually been shown to be up to 3-4 times more carcinogenic than high dose radiation.
To make things even worse, women with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 gene mutations are more vulnerable to radiation-induced cancers, but are encouraged (or often shamed) to have mammograms more often and starting earlier than women born with the normal variants of the genes.
Due to all the evidence stacking up against radiation and mammography, some members of the Swiss medical board are recommending that routine mammography screening be abolished.
Unfortunately, attitudes toward mammography are often greatly distant from reality, with many even believing that this screening method reduces breast cancer risk by at least half! This is not helped by the awareness brigade parroting slogans such as “early detection is the best protection” on television, including on Australian breakfast news programs.
So what is the alternative to radiation? Regular self-examination along with thermography is a safe, painless way to detect breast cancers early without causing them. However, a qualified practitioner must be found, and likely a thick skin developed for the inevitable comments that one is “taking the easy way out” instead of joining the brave, bold, and mutilated.
Saturday, April 30, 2016
TODDLERS TO BE TAUGHT ABOUT SEX, SEXUALITY, AND CROSS-DRESSING IN CHILD CARE CENTERS AND KINDERGARTENS
Toddlers to be taught about cross-dressing in controversial sex ed program
Note, Unless there is a revolution in this country, i would urge parents to pull all their kids out of schools, childcare centres, kindergartens & find other alternatives. This sick, perverted & completely organised agenda is now in full swing & young children’s minds are on the gay chopping block. This is not only a disgusting & perverted war on our children, it’s also a vicious & calculated war on the family unit. The perverts & pedophiles in our government & education system, along with their gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender army of crackpots are on the march & they are coming for your kids. This sick agenda & assault on children is being implemented under, anti-bullying programs in schools so it’s the perfect cover indeed.
TODDLERS will be taught about sex, sexuality and cross-dressing in a controversial national program being rolled out at childcare centres and kindergartens next month.
Educators will be encouraged to use dress-ups to explain cross-dressing to kids and may even take group tours of the opposite sex’s toilets as part of the Start Early initiative.
Teachers will use material provided by Early Childhood Australia, and books such as the book Children’s Sexual Development and Behaviour: Pants Aren’t Rude, by Pam Linke.
Suggestions in the book include teaching about sexuality in a positive way as a healthy part of life, ensuring children aren’t forced to kiss anyone they don’t want to and letting children know that “all parts of their body are good”.
Early Childhood Australia spokeswoman Clare McHugh said the program would reduce domestic violence because “rigid views on gender” were associated with violence and domestic violence.
“Children are sexual beings and it’s a strong part of their identity, and it is linked to their values and respect,” she said.
It comes after the federal government ordered a review of a Safe Schools program for secondary students including lessons on how to bind breasts and tuck in male genitalia.
Ms McHugh said the program was designed to “use everyday moments and interactions” to teach respect, ability and making choices.
“The underlying message is to value difference and be open to difference,” she said.
Dr Anne Kennedy, chairperson of Community Childcare Victoria, said there would be a “wide take-up” in Victoria.
She said the material would be handled sensitively and parents would be consulted.
“Educators deal with these issues all the time and the resources help them do better in the way they respond — in a developmentally and culturally responsible way,” she said.
Being Me Four corners program:
Victoria defies Malcolm Turnbull’s Safe Schools fix:
NHS to give sex change drugs to nine-year-olds:
The transgender conversation we had to have:
12 Things You Were Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi Germany
“After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.” -- – John F. Kennedy
Adolph Hitler was raised in a middle class family, and during the early years of his life his family even went through a difficult period of starvation. After being a soldier in world war I, on January 30th 1933, he found himself head of the German government, fulfilling the dream of every poor and middle class person who ever sought to make it big.
We are all familiar with the story of Hitler that the United States would like you to believe. Hitler has been made out to be one of the most “evil” people to have ever lived, slaughtering millions of innocent jews. This same story has been echoed throughout Hollywood for decades, and by now it’s safe to say billions of dollars have been spent to convince you of this black and white, good vs evil perspective about the Nazi regime. What if it isn’t entirely accurate?
After investigating the work of others who have documented history in an unbiased fashion, as well as those who have interviewed people who worked and lived alongside Hitler, there is strong evidence to suggest that what we’ve been told is extremely inaccurate. A completely new examination of Hitler and Nazi Germany during World War II is required, and from this examination a different story is sure to emerge.
Here are 12 things you were not told about Adolph Hitler and Nazi Germany:
1. HITLER BROKE FREE FROM THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING CARTELS
When Hitler’s period as Chancellor of Germany began, the German people had no work, no money and were starving. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread at the time, and many Germans were living in shacks after countless homes and farms had been seized by Rothschild/Rockefeller-controlled banks.
In his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Hitler’s Reichsbank President, Dr. Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, let out the big secret:
“The mark’s dramatic devaluation began soon after the Reichsbank was “privatized,” or delivered to private investors.”
In other words, responsible for the post-war hyperinflation was not the German government, but rather the privately owned central bank in Germany, and its monopoly it had over the creation of money. Germany’s economy was crashed and devastated by bankers… that is, until Hitler arrived.
After Hitler was elected, refusing to play ball with the Rockefeller-Rothschild rules, one of the first things he did was fix the corrupt, debt-based financial system. By completely thwarting the international banking cartels, the Nazi government issued its own currency known as Reich Marchs, which were debt free and uncontrollable by international financial interests.
Debt Free Finance = Freedom
If America nationalized their currency as Hitler did for Germany, they would effectively sever all ties with international bankers, the manipulation of their government and economy would cease, and they would live debt-free. Just as Hitler issued debt-free currency for Germany, Abraham Lincoln setup an interest free banking system in the United States when he was President, and he was murdered for it. Former US president Andrew Jackson issued interest-free currency, and two shots were fired at his head in an assassination attempt, but the shots misfired and he survived. John F. Kennedy issued interest-free currency during his presidency and we all know how he met his untimely demise.
After Germany’s public banking system was installed, world Jewry responded by declaring war on Germany, including a global boycott of German goods. Within two years, the German economy was flourishing with its new-found stable, and inflation-free currency.
2. HITLER CREATED A THRIVING ECONOMY WITH NO UNEMPLOYMENT
After setting up a public banking system, Hitler began his reign by constructing new roads, bridges, dams, canals, port facilities, and much needed repair of public and private buildings.
Everything was done with public money that owed no interest to the International “Banksters”. As Hitler said, “For every Mark issued, we required the equivalent of a Mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.”
Next, the NAZI government encouraged women to be homemakers, and all the work being done to repair and improve the country’s infrastructure and transportation created jobs for men. The unemployment problem had been solved within only two years, and Germany was back on its feet.
It’s often been claimed, that Hitler’s success in reviving his nation’s economy was based largely on government spending for rearmament. This is a myth. As the renowned British historian A. J. P. Taylor noted: “Germany’s economic recovery, which was complete by 1936, did not rest on rearmament; it was caused mainly by lavish expenditure on public works, particularly on motor roads, and this public spending stimulated private spending also, as [British economist John Maynard] Keynes had said it would. …while nearly everyone else in Europe expected a great war, Hitler was the one man who neither expected nor planned for it.”
– A. J. P. Taylor, From Sarajevo to Potsdam (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975), p. 140.
3. HITLER EMPHASIZED RESPECT FOR WOMEN, CHILDREN AND STRONG FAMILY VALUES
During the economic hardship just before Hitler was elected, Germany was seeing a declining rate of birth. In 1933, hitler passed a law that enabled married couples to obtain interest free loans minimum 1000 Reich Marks (equal to 9 months salary) to set up homes and start families.
For each child birthed, the couple was allowed to keep 250 marks and did not have to repay it. This system pioneered by the Nazi government exists today in Switzerland. In the eyes of Nazis, women were viewed as the preservers of the tribe, the guardians of future generations, and the priestesses of domestic virtue.
Recognizing that families are the primary unit around which a functioning society is built, Hitler emphasized the principle of maintaining a strong bond among family members. Admired for his high regard for mother’s, families were inspired and strengthened under the leadership of Hitler.
Poor families were helped by using financial incentives, and family allowances, marriage loans and child subsidies were provided equally to each and every segment of society.
4. NAZI PRESERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMALS
Under the Nazi regime, mishandling an animal was considered a heinous crime, and if somebody was discovered mistreating an animal, they were sent to concentration camps. As someone with great admiration for animals, Hitler showed great concern for animals native to Germany, and passed laws that ensured their safety and well-being.
In 1934, Hitler passed a law called Das Reichsjagdgesetz (the Reich Hunting Law), which regulated how many animals could be killed per year, and to establish proper ‘hunting seasons’. This law has now been adopted by most western countries.
Animal conservation was included in Primary, Secondary and College levels, and in 1935, the Reichsnaturschutzgesetz (Reich Nature Protection Act) was passed. which placed several native species on a protection list including the wolf and Eurasian lynx. It is likely that this law saved some native forest-inhabiting species from going extinct.
The Nazi’s were also the first to create environmental protection laws in history. The German Imperial Conservation law of 1935 was passed, which protected “remaining portions of landscape in free nature whose preservation on account of rarity, beauty, distinctiveness or on account of scientific, ethnic, forest, or hunting significance lies in the general interest.”
“[It is] useful to know the laws of nature – for that enables us to obey them. To act otherwise would be to rise in revolt against heaven.”
– Adolf Hitler
Hitler was a well-known lover of animals.
5. HITLER BANNED EXPERIMENTATION ON ANIMALS (VIVISECTION)
Nazy Germany was the first country in the world to ban vivisection, or any experimentation on live animals. With its great concern for animal conservation, and human treatment, a complete ban of vivisection was enacted in April 1933.
The Prime Minister of Prussia Hermann Goring has said:
“An absolute and permanent ban on vivisection is not only a necessary law to protect animals and to show sympathy with their pain, but it is also a law for humanity itself…. I have therefore announced the immediate prohibition of vivisection and have made the practice a punishable offense in Prussia. Until such time as punishment is pronounced the culprit shall be lodged in a concentration camp.”
This German cartoon depicts animals that were saved from vivisection saluting Hermann Goring. The sign in the window reads “Vivisection Forbidden”.
6. HITLER FUNDED RESEARCH INTO “FREE ENERGY” TECHNOLOGIES
Hitler was well aware that in order to truly escape the stronghold of economic manipulation by the international banking cartel he would need to find a way to eliminate Germany’s dependence on oil. An inexhaustible source of energy that was not monopolized by the private money cartels was required for true sovereignty, and this is what Hitler sought.
This pursuit led Germany to develop what has been called The Nazi Bell, which is described by author Joseph P. Farrell as “a hyper-dimensional physics device being researched under the auspices of the SS departments Entwicklungstelle-IV, Forschung, Entwicklung, und Patente, and SS General Hans Kammler’s super-secret weapons black projects think-tank, the Kammlerstab.“
According to Farrell, “the mission brief of the Entwicklungstelle IV was to develop free energy and to make Germany independent of foreign oil.”
The Nazi Bell was designed, in Farrell’s estimation, for a threefold purpose:
1. Energy Independence
2. Advanced Propulsion Technology
3. A Weapon of Tremendous Power
In his book Babylon’s Banksters, Joseph P. Farrell points to evidence that after the War, the United States made every effort to reconstruct the personnel team that worked on the Nazi Bell, so that they could develop the technology for themselves and restore the balance of power between “Nazi International” and “Anglo-American” elite factions.
7. GERMAN WORKERS WERE WELL-TREATED
With the goal of enhancing the standard of living for all German citizens equally, Adolph Hitler stimulated the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, by funding numerous worker’s welfare programs including:
- Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.
- 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people (Between 1933-1938). 2 million people went on cruises, and 11 million went on theater trips.
- Every citizen was given a radio.
- A 5 day work week for all citizens.
- Free Public Health.
- Hitler’s government banned Trade Unions, and it was mandatory that all workers had to join the German labor Front trade union. Strikes were banned, and people who refused to work were imprisoned.
- Every large factory had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools for its workers.
During the Third Reich, German workers were better treated than at any time before, or since.
8. ORGANIZED INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION & FARMING
As opposed to the current American economy, where production is driven by the pursuit of maximum profit, Hitler initiated a policy of self-sufficiency, where the goal was to produce only what is required by Germans. The goal of the Nazi government was to produce for its country everything the German people needed without having to rely on imports to meet the needs of its citizens.
Along with the calculated production of material goods, new policies were introduced so that the aim of farming was to produce what German’s needed, not what was most profitable. The government subsidized the farmers for loss of profit and farmers were given guarantees that all of what was grown would be purchased.
9. HITLER ELIMINATED CRIME AND IMPROVED HEALTH OF GERMANS
By giving social misfits and criminals jobs, Adolph Hitler was able to reduce the crime rate in Germany. In his 1976 book The Twelve-Year Reich, author R. Grunberger stated that there were significant drops in the rates of murder, robbery, theft, embezzlement and petty larceny during the Hitler years.
A canister used for collections during the Winter Relief Fund.
Many foreigners were impressed by the improved outlook and health of Germans, including Sir Arnold Wilson, a British M.P. who visited Germany seven times after Hitler came to power.
“Infant mortality has been greatly reduced and is considerably inferior to that in Great Britain,” wrote Wilson. “Tuberculosis and other diseases have noticeably diminished. The criminal courts have never had so little to do and the prisons have never had so few occupants. It is a pleasure to observe the physical aptitude of the German youth. Even the poorest persons are better clothed than was formerly the case, and their cheerful faces testify to the psychological improvement that has been wrought within them.”
10. NO CITIZEN WILL STARVE OR FREEZE
A prime philosophy of Germany at the time was that all citizens should share the same standard of living. With this in mind, Nazi Germany boasted one of the largest public welfare programs in history with the slogan “None shall starve nor freeze”. Every year, high-ranking Nazi’s and citizens would take to the streets to collect charity for the unfortunate, which generated a feeling of comradeship toward those in need.
They even went to the extent of publishing names of those who didn’t give charity in the paper as a punishment or reminder of their neglect. According to Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review,
“On one occasion, a civil servant was prosecuted for failure to donate, and his argument that it was voluntary was dismissed on the grounds it was an extreme view of liberty, to neglect all duties not actually prescribed by law, and therefore an abuse of liberty.”
11. THE NAZI ANTI-TOBACCO MISSION
Nazi doctors were the first to write a major scientific paper linking smoking to lung cancer. Following this report, smoking was banned in restaurants and public transportation systems. Advertising of smoking and cigarettes was severely regulated by the Nazis, and tobacco tax was raised to deter people from smoking. In what was one of the most expensive and effective anti-tobacco movements in history, numerous German health organizations began educating the public that risks of miscarriage were heightened when pregnant women engaged in smoking.
Nazi Anti-Tobacco Ad: “He does not devour it, it [the cigarette] devours him!”
In the year 1940, while annual cigarette consumption per capita in America was over 3,000, in Germany it was only 749.
- Hitler prohibited the sale of cigarettes to women.
- Hitler prohibited smoking for people under the age of 18.
- Hitler prohibited smoking for people in uniforms.
- Hitler prohibited smoking in public areas.
- Hitler was the first to place “warning” photos of cancerous lungs on cigarette boxes.
12. NAZI’S CREATED A CULTURE THAT CHERISHED MUSIC
Recognizing the importance weaving music into the fabric of a country rich in culture, Hitler founded the State Music Institute in 1933 after he came into power. Its purpose was to promote the timeless work of composers such as Beethoven, Mozart, Brahms, Wagner, among others. The Nazis ensured that every German citizen had a radio.
Youngsters were encouraged by the Nazi government to pursue music as a career in order to preserve the rich ancient German cultural heritage. Jazz, Swing, and sexually provocative music were all banned in Germany during the Hitler era.