Thursday, December 14, 2017


Image Source:

Source Article:
1 in 36: ASD Rate Set a New Record High in 2016

The National Health Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released its latest prevalence rate for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in American children this Wednesday. Their “data brief”, which is based on information gathered in the National Health Information Survey (NHIS), reported an ASD rate for 2016 of 2.76%, or 1 in 36 American children (1).

This is the highest rate ever recorded in a national survey of children in the United States and was an increase from the rate of 1 in 45 children (or 2.24%) reported in the 2014 NHIS survey (2). The ASD information reported in these surveys includes children between the ages of 3 and 17 years of age and any diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder, including Asperger’s syndrome.

This startling new peak received virtually no media coverage and was downplayed by the NCHS, whose headline finding was that--despite setting a new American record with a 1 in 36 ASD rate: “There was not a statistically significant change in the prevalence of children ever diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder from 2014 to 2016.” (1)

Yet this new 2016 rate is a sharp increase from the 2007 report, the first year in which the NHIS included the question, “Has a doctor or health professional ever told you that [sample child] had Autism, Asperger’s disorder, pervasive developmental disorder, or autism spectrum disorder?” The 2007 report, also measuring the rate for 3-17 year-old children, reported an autism rate of 1.1%, or 1 in 91 American children (3).

The NCHS, like the CDC a department within the Department of Health and Human Services, follows a different methodology in the NHIS than the approach used by the CDC’s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Network (ADDM), which last reported an autism rate of 1 in 68 American children for 8-year-olds born in 2004 (4). The ADDM network’s estimates likely include fewer children with Asperger’s (only about 10% of the ADDM cases have an Asperger’s diagnosis), which may explain why NHIS ASD rates have been generally higher than ADDM rates.

The ADDM Network has reported autism rates every two years with reports of 8-year-olds from 2000 to 2012 (4). The NHIS reports have been published only intermittently, with four different publications since 2007 (1-3, 5). Unlike the ADDM report, the NCHS publications have followed subtly different methodologies.

But an increase of 147% in less than a decade is certainly an urgent cause for concern: indeed, the new report also described another record rates for ASD of 1 in 28 (!) for boys born between 2014 and 2016. Because the NHIS survey includes many children younger than 8 years of age, their ASD prevalence rates are likely understated, since many younger children don’t receive an autism diagnosis before they are 8 years old. The new report reflects this bias, since it shows an ASD rate of 1 in 45 children in the 3-7-year-old group, likely an underestimate of the true rate for that cohort.

On a personal note, it’s now almost exactly ten years since Dan Olmsted, Kim Rossi, JB Handley and I launched in November, 2007. Soon after, when the NHIS survey came out reporting a 2007 autism rate that first breached the 1% barrier, my autistic child was barely a teenager and I remember thinking, “surely, we will begin to treat autism like a national emergency now that 1 in 91 children are affected.” A little less than a year ago, Dan passed away suddenly only a week after he and I finished writing Denial: How Refusing to Face the Facts about Our Autism Epidemic Hurts Children, Families, and Our Future, a title that reflected our shared sense of outrage over the denialism reflected so clearly in this new NCHS publication and its reception. My daughter turned 22 this week, formally passing the threshold of adulthood in the autism services system. And on the exact, same day she entered her adult program, we learned that ASD rates in American are approaching 3% of children and 4% of boys.

It was as if nothing has happened. The world has truly gone crazy.


Zablotsky B, Black LI, Blumberg SJ. Estimated prevalence of children with diagnosed developmental disabilities in the United States, 2014–2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 291. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017.

Zablotsky B, Black LI, Maenner MJ, Schieve LA, Blumberg SJ. Estimated prevalence of autism and other developmental disabilities following questionnaire changes in the 2014 National Health Interview Survey. National Health Statistics Reports: No 87. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2015.

Kogan MD et al. Prevalence of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder among children in the US, 2007. Pediatrics 124(5):1395–403. 2009.

Christensen DL, Baio J, Van Naarden Braun K, Bilder D, Charles J, Constantino JN, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years––Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 sites, United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65(3):1–23. 2016.

Blumberg SJ, Bramlett MD, Kogan MD, et al. Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011–2012. National Health Statistics Reports; no 65. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013.


In reading the article below, I noted the following:

At least 3 out of 8 uterus transplant attempts have failed. The after-effects of this type of surgery and the health effects on both the donors and the recipients is never discussed.

Instead, we learn that some of the uterus "donors" are dead. For anyone who knows anything about organ "donation," it is common knowledge that organ donors are NOT dead when their organs are removed. Instead, they are very much alive and are literally tortured to death by medical professionals who offer no anesthesia during the removal of organs, but instead paralyze their victims with toxic drugs so the victims cannot move or scream while their organs are being removed. This torture ultimately KILLS the organ "donors" who die from the pain and from the forced removal of their organs by the medical system. For more info on this, please see:

Organ Donation & Medical Murder - BNE TV w guest Dr. Paul Byrne

What do we suppose happens when a uterus from a tortured dead person is implanted into the body of a living person? What are the impacts on the health and well being of the mother? What are the impacts on the psyche and spiritual integrity of the child that is placed in this uterus to grow?

We should not be surprised to learn that the baby came out screaming. However, despite our society normalizing this, babies should not be screaming at birth. If they are, it is likely because they have been badly traumatized.

From one of the pictures in the article, it appears that the baby is now spending time in NICU. NICU stays are all too common with babies who are brought forth through artificial reproductive technologies, as are cesarean deliveries, which this baby also suffered. Babies born by c-section and/or who spend time in NICU can have serious difficulty bonding with their parents. In NICU, they are isolated, sometimes in artificial wombs called "incubators," and nearly every touch they receive involves extreme pain. Furthermore, just like organ "donors," NICU babies are repeatedly paralyzed with toxic drugs but given no anesthetic during painful procedures. In other words, NICU babies are daily tortured and I can attest to this fact, having watched my baby be repeatedly tortured during her two month stay in a NICU.

In this particular case, the situation is even worse because the baby's "conception" also involved extreme pain — as the mother had to undergo several major surgeries in order to have her eggs removed in preparation for IVF and another person's uterus implanted into her body. She also endured surgery for a cesarean birth, all of which will interfere with her ability to actually mother this child. None of this is physically or emotionally healthy and all of it is the antithesis of what birth should be.

How long so do we suppose this mother will live after being exposed to so much medical sleight of hand and several major surgeries? What happens to the child if the mother dies at an early age as a result of these chimeric and torturous procedures?

Children who are created like this often feel like "science experiments" as they come of age. Some wish they were never born. Their sadness about their loveless, trauma-filled conception, gestation and birth is life long. It will influence all aspects of their lives. For more info on this, please see:

Adding insult to injury is the fact that the baby's conception also involved some form of pornographic thought as the one who gives sperm is often forced to masturbate in a "masturbatorium" where pornography abounds and where ejaculate is released into a cup. It's absolutely disgusting and the antithesis of the natural order which involves a love-filled conception.

Artificial reproductive technologies are alien technologies. They are a form of transhumanism designed to do away with the natural order, eliminate human love, and make the creation of life a technological matter. How far do we let this go? How long do we leave our heads buried in the sand and pretend that this is all OK?

I've no doubt they are planning to try to insert uteruses into men to further their sick transgender agenda. When do we say enough?

Source Article:
Exclusive: First U.S. Baby Born After a Uterus Transplant

For the first time in the United States, a woman who was born without a uterus gave birth to a baby. The landmark birth took place at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, a part of Baylor Scott & White, TIME reports exclusively.

“We’ve been preparing for this moment for a very long time,” says Dr. Liza Johannesson, an ob-gyn and uterus transplant surgeon at Baylor. “I think everyone had tears in their eyes when the baby came out. I did for sure.” The woman and her husband asked that their identity not be revealed in order to protect their privacy

The birth took place at Baylor — the first birth in the hospital’s ongoing uterus transplant clinical trial. Women who participate in the trial have what’s called absolute uterine factor infertility (AUI), which means their uterus is nonfunctioning or nonexistent. Most of the women in the trial have a condition called Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome — and have lived their entire lives under the assumption that they would never be able to be pregnant or give birth to a baby. The procedure could also work for women with other medical issues, such as certain cancers.

“We do transplants all day long,” says Dr. Giuliano Testa, the leader of the uterus transplant clinical trial at Baylor, and surgical chief of abdominal transplant for Baylor Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute. “This is not the same thing. I totally underestimated what this type of transplant does for these women. What I’ve learned emotionally, I do not have the words to describe.”

The birth was a scheduled Caesarean section, and most members of the multidisciplinary clinical trial team were present. The baby was delivered healthy and screaming. “I’ve delivered a lot of babies, but this one was special,” says Dr. Robert T. Gunby Jr., the obstetrician and gynecologist who delivered the baby. “When I started my career we didn’t even have sonograms. Now we are putting in uteruses from someone else and getting a baby.”

The moment Dr. Gunby first held up the baby was emotional for many members of the medical team. “Outside my own children, this is the most excited I’ve ever been about any baby being born,” says Dr. Gregory J. McKenna, a transplant surgeon at Baylor. “I just started to cry.”

A donor’s gift

Taylor Siler, 36, a registered nurse in the Dallas area, donated her uterus to the woman who recently gave birth. Siler wasn’t always certain she wanted to have children, but she says deciding to get pregnant was one of her best decisions. “Once they lay that baby in your arms,” Siler says. “Your life changes forever.”

Siler, who has two boys aged 6 and 4, came across a news segment about Baylor’s uterus transplant program. She and her husband had already decided they were not going to have any more children, and she wanted to offer someone else a shot at motherhood. “I have family members who struggled to have babies, and it’s not fair,” says Siler. “I just think that if we can give more people that option, that’s an awesome thing.”

Siler went through extensive screening about both her physical and mental health before getting approval for the trial. Participating required surgery and about 12 weeks of recovery. Baylor says it typically takes about five hours for the wombs to be removed from the living donors, and another five to transplant.

Though she did not know the woman who received her uterus, Siler and the recipient exchanged letters on the day of the surgery, and the recipient sent Siler another letter to let her know when she was pregnant. Baylor informed Siler this week that the woman had given birth. “I’ve just been crying and getting teary thinking about it, “ says Siler, who had not yet met the new mother when she spoke to TIME. “I think about her every day and I probably will for the rest of my life.”

How a uterus transplant works

The women in the clinical trial are transplanted with a uterus from either a living or deceased donor. The woman who gave birth received her transplant from Siler, who was a so-called “altruistic” living donor: a stranger who volunteered to donate her uterus to a woman without one. So far, Baylor says they’ve had over 70 women express interest in donating their uterus.

Baylor will complete a total of 10 uterus transplants as part of its first trial. So far the hospital has completed eight. At least three have failed. The hospital has confirmed to Time that there is another woman in the trial who is pregnant, using a living donor uterus.

Baylor’s uterus transplant program is one of a handful to launch in the United States in recent years, and it’s the first to use both living and deceased donors. Successful uterus transplants from live donors have taken place in Sweden — a medical team at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg pioneered the first uterus transplant trial that resulted in eight births. This first birth at Baylor is the first to replicate that success.

Dr. Johannesson was part of the original uterus transplant team and has since moved to Texas in order to work on the Baylor program. “We were very proud of the first birth in Sweden,” she says. “But this birth is what’s going to make the field grow, because this is the first time this has been replicated anywhere else. This step is equally, if not even more, important.”

The recipients in the clinical trial are between the ages of 20 to 35, and the donors must be between ages 30 to 60. “When you donate a kidney, you do it to help someone live longer and get off dialysis,” says Dr. Testa. “For these women, they are donating an experience.”

Most of the women in the trial have moved to the Dallas area in order to undergo the procedures and the many follow up visits and tests. Once the women in the trial are transplanted with the uterus, they wait to recover and achieve menstruation, usually about four weeks from transplant. Women whose transplant is successful can then attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF). (The women in the trial have functioning ovaries that are not attached to their wombs, which is why IVF is required to get pregnant.)

Uterus transplants are expensive, with some estimates putting the cost at up to $500,000. Like other infertility treatments, it’s very rare that an insurance company would cover the procedure, which is largely viewed as elective. Baylor covered the cost of the first 10 transplants in the clinical trial, but the medical team is now seeking funding—largely through donations from institutions and private donors—in order to continue. The team says many more transplants need to be done before it could be provided as a standard treatment. “The reality is that it’s going to be very difficult for many women to afford this,” says Testa.

Renewed hope

Last year, when Baylor began the trial, Testa told TIME that the study would not be deemed a success unless the transplants resulted in a birth. Compared to other transplants that he regularly performs, like liver or kidneys, where surgeons know within minutes if the organ is working, Testa says waiting through the pregnancy after uterus transplant can feel excruciating.

“I was already nervous when my wife was pregnant, and this felt worse, like it was my pregnancy,” says Testa.

Since the procedure requires an otherwise healthy person to undergo multiple surgeries and take powerful medication, women in uterus transplant trials often say they experience comments from people asking why they don’t opt for surrogacy or adoption. “A lot of people underestimate the impact that infertility can have on a person’s wellbeing,” says Johannesson. “It can have such a profound impact.”

Baylor says they do not view uterus transplants as a replacement for other approaches like adoption or surrogacy, but as another option for women and their partners.

Baylor will continue to follow the health of the baby as part of the study. The goal is for the birth to mark the beginning of a new field of infertility treatment research, rather than be an outlier.

“For the girl who is getting the [infertility] diagnosis now, it’s not hopeless,” says Kristin Posey Wallis, a uterine transplant nurse at Baylor who works closely with women and their donors. “There’s hope.”

Tuesday, December 5, 2017


I have long suspected that it was jews who are responsible for the theft, takeover, and destruction of Hawaii. The so-called "American" occupation of this once great land (i.e., the Kingdom of Hawaii) has, for some time, been blamed on "Christian" sugar planters. However, the unscrupulous and evil activities involved in the creation of the so-called "state" of Hawaii, combined with the extreme attack and disrespect for the indigenous people of Hawaii and the land itself, would indicate that it was, in fact, jews that organized and orchestrated it all. It is only they that have the capacity for such annihilation of everything that is good and beautiful. And it is only they that seem entirely bent on taking over and destroying the entire world. I should have known this all along but alas, I was not jew-wise until just a few years ago and I suffered from mind control which caused me to blame everything on those nasty "whites" and "Christians" - instead of setting my eyes on the right perpetrators -- jews. In Truth, it appears that all those so-called "Christian" sugar planters were, in fact, jews that had changed their last names in order to hide their jewish identities -- something they are quite fond of doing so nobody suspects who the real culprits are.

The fact that these evil creatures still operate their extremely toxic sugar cane factories on Maui, and get away with setting acres and acres of land on fire daily and ruthlessly murdering every animal and insect that lives in those fields while simultaneously choking out entire cities like Kihei with their filthy black smoke, is indicative that THEY (luciferian jews) are the ones who control the completely illegal fake "state" of Hawaii and THEY are the ones who should be executed or imprisoned when the shit hits the fan and the people finally rebel.

Here's an excerpt from my book that describes the horrendous situation on Maui.

In order to harvest the sugar cane, the criminally insane psychopaths that run the sugar-cane industry (who, by the way, come from the very same bloodlines that masterminded the illegal U.S. occupation of Hawaii which began in 1893 and continues to this day), violently traumatize the plants by withholding water from them for six weeks before harvest. After forcing the plants to go into shock, they then proceed to archaically set the plants on fire, leaving a barren and desolate wasteland for miles and miles and destroying the lives and habitat of many species. MASSIVE clouds of black smoke rise up into the atmosphere on burn days (almost every day for at least nine months out of the year), blanketing huge parts of the island in toxic soot and poisoning everything in its wake.

“Roughly six weeks before a Maui sugarcane field is harvested, crews gradually eliminate its drip irrigation. Shocked by this sudden manmade drought after nearly two years of regular watering, the cane begins to store energy. Thick stalks load up on sugar while leafy tops yellow under the tropical sun. Everything is drying for the big burn…

When set right, the fires create a sort of vacuum as they collapse in upon themselves. Burning superhot and fast, the flames expel smoke, steam and ash straight up, thousands of feet into the air. If things go as planned, the smoke and ash are shot so high that the upper-level winds catch them and blow them out to sea before they can fall back toward neighborhoods, schools and beaches.

On a calm day, a cane fire looks a bit like a nuclear bomb has been detonated. Tourists pull off the road, scratching their heads and wondering whether the end has arrived. Once the uninitiated are assured that yonder Pa‘ia has not been wiped off the map, they almost always pose the same awestruck question: “How do they get away with that?”

Not surprisingly, the people that live downwind of this monstrous industry suffer from severe respiratory problems and other illnesses, and of course, premature death. The fact that the U.S. Federal Government subsidizes this insanity (and has done so for close to 100 years) is a clear indication that it wants to destroy Hawaiian land and people and that that has been the agenda from the very beginning. In fact, the entities that control the U.S. government are bent on annihilating the indigenous way of life of the Hawaiian people because that way of life allows humans to exist outside of the technocratic system! They refuse to allow this. They have sought repeatedly and with a vengeance to destroy indigenous cultures and land around the globe (and this includes decimating the Native American people of North America) in order to impose their technocratic way of life on everyone and render us all dependent on their artificial system for our survival.

Obviously, sugar cane burning should have been extinguished decades ago (along with the people responsible for it). There have been many, many good and caring people who have fought long and hard to ensure its demise, but unfortunately for us (and for all the plants, animals, birds, fish, and insects that are affected by it as well), its presence still persists.

Jews also control Monsanto, which is another extremely TOXIC and DEADLY industry that has been set-up right in the middle of Kihei in order to wreak maximum harm. Monsanto's Round-Up has been linked to umbilical, placental and fetal deformities, birth defects, infertility, the destruction of testosterone,and is causing huge tumors, cancer and death in rats. This is just scratching the surface of what this evil corporation is capable of.

Follow these links for some interesting information on the filthy, disgusting, evil history of Monsanto, and the jews that control it, and its original, jewish, slave-dealing family:

Source Articl:
MONSANTO Family Were Jewish Slave Dealers And Owners

Here is some interesting MONSANTO history:

The Jewish Monsanto Family of Louisiana included Benjamin, Isaac, Manuel, Eleanora, Gracia and Jacob. They made frequent purchases of Blacks including twelve in 1785, thirteen and then thirty-one in 1787, and eighty in 1768.

In 1794, Benjamin sold "Babet," a Black woman, to Franco Cardel. Manuel sold two Blacks from Guinea named "Polidor" and "Lucy" to James Saunders for $850 in silver.

As individuals they were owners of Africans whom they named "Quetelle," "Valentin," "Baptiste," "Prince," "Princess," "Ceasar," "Dolly," "Jen," "Fanchonet," "Rozetta," "Mamy," "Sofia," and many others. Isaac repeatedly mortgaged four of these when in financial trouble. Benjamin Monsanto of Natchez, Mississippi entered into at least 6 contracts for the sale of his slaves which would take place after his death. Gracia bequeathed nine Africans to her relatives in her 1790 will, and Eleanora also held Blacks as slaves.

Manuel Jacob Monsanto entered into at least 12 contracts for sale of slaves between 1787 and 1789 in Natchez and New Orleans, Louisiana.1135 "His family consists of himself and seven Negroes."1136 Later, "Jacob Monsanto, son of Isaac Rodrigues Monsanto, one of the very first known Jews to settle in New Orleans, owner of a several-hundred-acre plantation at Manchac, fell in love with his slave, Mamy or Maimi William. Their daughter Sophia, grew up to be a lovely quadroon." An excerpt of one of Benjamin's many slave contracts follows:

"Be it known to all to whom these presents shall come, that I Benjamin Monsanto do really and effectually sell to Henry Manadu a negro wench named "Judy," aged Eighteen years, native of Guinea, for the sum of four hundred Dollars in all the month of January in the year one thousand Seven hundred and ninety one; and paying interest at the rate of ten per cent for the remaining two hundred and fifty Dollars until paid; said negro wench being and remaining mortgaged until final payment shall have been made; wherewith I acknowledge to be fully satisfied and content, hereby renouncing the plea of non numerata pecunia, fraud, or others in the case Whatsoever; granting formal receipt for the same. For which said consideration I do hereby resign all right, title, possession and claim, in and to the said Slave, all of which I transfer and convey to the Said Purchaser and his assigns, to be, as his own, held and enjoyed, and when fully paid for, Sold, exchanged, or otherwise alienated at pleasure in virtue of these presents granted in his favor in token of real delivery, without other proof of property being required, from which he is hereby released, binding myself to maintain the validity of this present sale in full form and right in favor of the Purchaser aforesaid, and granting authority to the Justices of his Majesty to compel me to the performance of the same as if Judgment had already been given therein, renouncing all laws, rights, and privileges in my favor whatsoever. And I the said Henry Manadu being present, do hereby accept this Instrument in my favor, receiving said negro Wench as purchased in the form and for the consideration therein mentioned and contained, wherewith I am fully satisfied and content, hereby renouncing the plea of non numerato pecunia, fraud, or other considerations in the case Whatsoever; granting formal receipt for the same. Done and executed, in testimony thereof, at the post of Natchez, this nineteenth day of the month of February in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety...."

Benjamin Monsanto, sold land and "a Dwelling House, Store, and two other buildings, for which I have received payment in a negro, named 'Nat;' to my full satisfaction." Another contract stipulated "that Don Louis Faure is bound to defend the said sale in case the negro shall be claimed by any other Person." In a 1792 contract, Benjamin mortgaged his Black slaves: "I do hereby specially mortgage three slaves to me belonging, namely Eugene and Louis, aged twenty four years each, the first named of the Senegal nation and the second of the Congo nation; and a Negro Woman named Adelaide, aged twenty eight years, also of the Congo nation; which said slaves I warrant free from mortgage or other incumbrance, as I have made appear by certificate from the Recorder of mortgages; and which said slaves I promise and engage shall not be sold nor otherwise alienated during the term of this obligation..."


The following Jews were known dealers, owners, shippers or supporters of the slave trade and of the enslavement of Black African citizens in early New York history.

Issack Asher, Jacob Barsimson, Joseph Bueno, Solomon Myers Cohen, Jacob Fonseca, Aberham Franckfort, Jacob Franks, Daniel Gomez, David Gomez, Isaac Gomez, Lewis Gomez, Mordecai Gomez, Rebekah Gomez, Ephraim Hart, Judah Hays, Harmon Hendricks, Uriah Hendricks, Uriah Hyam, Abraham Isaacs, Joshua Isaacs, Samuel Jacobs, Benjamin S. Judah, Cary Judah, Elizabeth Judah, Arthur Levy, Eleazar Levy, Hayman Levy, Isaac H. Levy, Jacob Levy, Joseph Israel Levy, Joshua Levy, Moses Levy, Uriah Phillips Levy, Isaac R. Marques, Moses Michaels, (E)Manuel Myers, Seixas Nathan, Simon Nathan, Rodrigo Pacheco, David Pardo, Isaac Pinheiro, Rachel Pinto, Morris Jacob, Raphall Abraham Sarzedas, Moses Seixas, Solomon Simpson, Nathan Simson, Simja De Torres, Benjamin Wolf, Alexander Zuntz

To read more...about Jewish Slave Dealers And Owners

And finally, here's an article that just came in today affirming that the sugar industry has been lying and manipulating science for decades to cover up the fact that sugar consumption is causing heart disease, diverting the blame to saturated fats which can actually be beneficial for the heart.

Source Article:
Public Health SCANDAL! Sugar Industry Hid Science Linking Sugar to Heart Disease – Blamed Saturated Fats and Cholesterol Instead

Can We Trust Industry-Sponsored Scientific Studies and Government Agencies Approving such “Science”?

It has been well documented in recent times that “science” published in peer-reviewed journals is largely funded by corporate interests, where widespread corruption is now the norm.

Results are determined long before the studies are funded to promote special interests.

Here are some recent articles we have published here at Health Impact News exposing this corruption:

Peer-reviewed Scientific Literature Filled with Fake Science

The Corruption of Science: Who Funds Vaccine Safety Studies?

In 2015, Dr. Mercola reported that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regularly reviews scientific literature and finds corruption, but does nothing about it!

The FDA reviews several hundred clinical trial locations that conduct research on human participants each year in order to be sure they’re engaging in good clinical practice. But what happens when they find evidence of questionable procedures or practices?

In the most serious of cases, the FDA can classify it as “official action indicated,” or OAI. This is reserved for “severe” forms of clinical trial violations, including “objectionable conditions or practices” that warrant compulsory regulatory action, as opposed to “voluntary action indicated” for lesser violations.”

Now, if a trial had been deemed OAI by the FDA, you might assume that you’d see evidence of that when reading the results of studies based on said data. But that would be a liberal assumption. Researchers conducted a review of FDA inspection reports between 1998 and 2013.

They found 60 clinical trials that had been classified as OAI, and these trials had been used for data in 78 published articles. Out of those 78 studies, only three included mentions of the violations found by the FDA!

And we’re not talking about small, innocent mistakes. The violations included fraud, incompetence, and misconduct. This means that anyone browsing a medical journal might be making decisions based on fraudulent published studies. (Source.)

Likewise, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), another government agency tasked with protecting the public’s interest, has been exposed for having massive conflicts of interest preventing them from representing true, unbiased scientific studies.

Jeanne Lenzer, associate editor of the British Medical Journal, published an investigative report showing how the U.S. CDC is not honest when publishing disclaimers in their studies stating that “they have no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products.”

The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law.

Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.

See: Can We Trust the CDC? British Medical Journal Reveals CDC Lies About Ties to Big Pharma

The War On Fats: How Bad Politics Corrupted Good Science

There is probably no greater danger to public health today than the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and FDA’s advice and regulations regarding dietary fats.

Since the 1970s, and the infamous “McGovern Report” on nutrition which condemned saturated fats and blamed them for causing heart disease, the health of Americans has spiraled out of control, with epidemics in obesity, diabetes, cancer, and heart disease, which combined represent most causes of death today in the U.S.

This YouTube clip contains actual film footage by ABC news regarding the McGovern report in 1977, and how scientists cautioned the politicians at that time that the science did NOT support the conclusion that saturated fats and cholesterol caused heart disease.

The McGovern Report

The science, REAL science that is unbiased and not tied into industry-funded special interest groups, has exonerated saturated fats and cholesterol from causing heart disease for many years now.

If you want to research this topic for yourself, we have linked to many published studies and commentaries by physicians and other scientists over the years here at Health Impact News. Learn more:

Truth about Saturated Fats – Exposing the Cholesterol Myth

Unfortunately, government nutrition advice today still recommends a low-fat diet, encouraging consumption of carbohydrates, which includes refined sugars.

Even some in the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media have exposed the scientific fraud regarding saturated fats in recent years, but the main reason is not because they have “seen the light” regarding scientific dietary nutrition, but because Big Food has come to realize that consumers want to return to traditional fats, such as butter and coconut oil, which have been part of the food chain for many thousands of years, and have rejected the government and industry-sponsored science trying to convince them that saturated fats are bad.

Researchers Find Corruption in Older Sugar-Industry Sponsored Studies Exonerating Dangers of Sugar and Condemning Fats Instead

For the past year, a group of researchers with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), has reviewed historical scientific literature funded by the Sugar Research Foundation since the 1960s, which gives us a great perspective on how the war on saturated fats became public policy.

These researchers at UCSF, Cristin E. Kearns, DDS, MBA; Laura A. Schmidt, PhD, MSW, MPH; and Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, have revealed how the Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) influenced Harvard medical researchers financially and otherwise to report open-ended inconclusive research that omitted a lot of conclusive negative health data.

Their first article was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA Internal Medicine) in 2016. The title of the study is Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents.

The New York Times, which has given some press to exposing the saturated fat myth for about ten years now, led the mainstream media outlets that covered the UCSF study:

How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat

Here are some excerpts:

The sugar industry paid scientists in the 1960s to play down the link between sugar and heart disease and promote saturated fat as the culprit instead, newly released historical documents show.

The internal sugar industry documents, recently discovered by a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, and published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, suggest that five decades of research into the role of nutrition and heart disease, including many of today’s dietary recommendations, may have been largely shaped by the sugar industry.

“They were able to derail the discussion about sugar for decades,” said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at U.C.S.F. and an author of the JAMA Internal Medicine paper.

The documents show that a trade group called the Sugar Research Foundation, known today as the Sugar Association, paid three Harvard scientists the equivalent of about $50,000 in today’s dollars to publish a 1967 review of research on sugar, fat and heart disease. The studies used in the review were handpicked by the sugar group, and the article, which was published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, minimized the link between sugar and heart health and cast aspersions on the role of saturated fat.

Even though the influence-peddling revealed in the documents dates back nearly 50 years, more recent reports show that the food industry has continued to influence nutrition science.

NPR was another news source that covered the UCSF study in 2016:

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

The UCSF researchers disclosed how a top executive, John Hickson, vice-president of the SRF at the time took on the task of finding a way to discredit the increasing studies demonstrating sugar’s role in creating bad heart health.

Interestingly, a few years later in the early 1970s, Hickson became part of the tobacco industry’s PR machinery with the Cigar Research Council.

“In 1972, an internal tobacco industry memo on Mr. Hickson noted that he had a reputation for manipulating science to achieve his goals,” and “ …[he is] a supreme scientific politician who had been successful in condemning cyclamates [earlier artificial sweeteners], on behalf of the Sugar Research Council, on somewhat shaky evidence.” (Source)

Hickson had come up the idea of funding their own research which would enable them to legitimately and officially discredit all the anti-health sugar conclusions. The operational key for this scheme was in Harvard, where “one of the researchers was the chairman of Harvard’s Public Health Nutrition Department — and an ad hoc member of SRF’s board.” (Source)

Their review was published in a 1967 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The fact that it was published in such a prestigious journal as a scientific literature review was enough to establish legitimacy, at least enough to confuse, if not convince, with their inconclusive commentaries of “further studies needed.”

The review also maintained the now debunked lipid theory of heart disease by encouraging a low fat diet.

The “Inconvenient Truth” that Refined Sugar is Linked to Heart Disease and Cancer Was Never Published

The same UCSF team of researchers had another paper published last month (November 2017) by the open access journal PLOS Biology titled, “Sugar industry sponsorship of germ-free rodent studies linking sucrose to hyperlipidemia and cancer: An historical analysis of internal documents.”

Again, internal memos were added to the analysis of data from another SRF funded study conducted in England called “Project 259: Dietary Carbohydrate and Blood Lipids in Germ-Free Rats,” led by Dr. W.F.R. Pover at the UK’s University of Birmingham between 1967 and 1971.

The UCSF researchers managed to get the Project 259 material despite its never being published. The SRF didn’t continue sufficient funding to allow the researchers completion for publishing.

Hicks had to back out, despite a huge monetary expenditure, because Project 259, intended to prove sucrose was more beneficial than other carbohydrates, was beginning to backfire.

SRF was not getting the pro-sugar “science” they had sought.

Early reports of the animal (mouse) studies were revealing certain gut reactions from sucrose were creating excess triglyceride serum levels, an accepted marker for increased cardiac disease risks. This process also produced an enzyme that contributed to a metabolic carcinogenic cascade observed with bladder cancer.

This inconvenient truth could have helped chip away the foundation of the dietary fats dogma and pointed to real research on obesity and heart disease, but it was conveniently never disclosed publicly.

Here’s an excerpt that captures the motivational essence of the PLOS paper published in 2017 by the UCSF team:

On January 5, 2016, the Sugar Association issued a press release criticizing findings from a study published in Cancer Research using multiple mouse models that suggested that dietary sugar induces increased tumor growth and metastasis when compared to a non-sugar starch diet.

The Sugar Association stated that ‘no credible link between ingested sugars and cancer has been established.’

In contrast, this paper provides empirical data suggesting that the sugar industry terminated funding of an animal study that was finding unfavorable results with respect to the association between dietary sugars and cancer, with possible translational importance to humans.

From the 2017 paper’s abstract:

The [early Project 259] results suggested to SRF that gut microbiota have a causal role in carbohydrate-induced hypertriglyceridemia. A study comparing conventional rats fed a high-sugar diet to those fed a high-starch diet suggested that sucrose consumption might be associated with elevated levels of beta-glucuronidase, an enzyme previously associated with bladder cancer in humans. (Full text study source)

This last revelation is an example of damaging data discovered inadvertently and discarded. These are but two examples of how nutritional scientific research is easily manipulated by industry sources simply to improve its bottom line. There are more.

When it comes to the dogma that “saturated fats cause obesity and heart disease,” the sugar industry has been instrumental in keeping it alive to the detriment of national and international public health wherever this totally false saturated fat/cholesterol dogma has been “officially” adopted.

The abandoned Project 259 could have led to more research on sugar’s influence with cancer. Instead, carcinogenic comfort foods along with toxic chemotherapy drugs continues to be part of the failed “War on Cancer.”

UCSF is the same institution where Dr. Robert Lustig launched his video lecture that went viral, “Sugar: The Bitter Truth,” which explains both the business end of sugar and HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) in so many processed foods with their consequences, which are wrongly blamed on saturated fats: Obesity; diabetes 2; coronary heart disease (CHD); coronary artery disease (CAD).

Sugar: The Bitter Truth

Why Has the Saturated Fat and Cholesterol Myth Been Allowed to Continue?

Scottish doctor Malcom Kendrick has stated that the idea that saturated fat causes heart disease is “The Greatest Scam in the History of Medicine.”

The answer to the question “Why has the saturated fat and cholesterol myth been allowed to continue” is quite simple. Lowering cholesterol has historically been the largest revenue stream for drugs among pharmaceutical companies.

Sales of statin drugs to lower cholesterol are the top selling drugs of all time. It is a $100 BILLION a year industry.

Before its patent expired, the cholesterol-lowering drug Lipitor was the best-selling drug of all time, grossing over $140 billion, with no serious close competitors in the history of pharmaceutical drugs. The FDA did not issue warnings about the dangerous side effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs until after Lipitor’s patent expired.

One out of every four Americans over the age of 50 is taking a statin drug to lower their cholesterol.

Learn more about the “statin scam” with cholesterol lowering drugs.

Dr. MaryAnne Demasi’s documentary on the criminal activity of the pharmaceutical industry regarding cholesterol-lowering statin drugs sent shock waves through the mainstream media in Australia at the end of 2013.

Published in two parts on the popular news show The Catalyst, the pharmaceutical industry complained loudly after the first show, and requested the network not air the second episode, “Heart of the Matter Part 2 – Cholesterol Drug War.”

ABC Australia aired it anyway, but the pharmaceutical influence was apparently too strong, as they later announced that the network would remove the videos from their website because “they breached its impartiality standards.” All copies found on YouTube were also removed, but it has been copied widely and can still be found on YouTube. Here are two copies:

Heart of the Matter – Dietary Villains – Part 1

Heart of the Matter – Cholesterol Drug War – Part 2

How Many Lives Have Been Destroyed by Faulty Science and Wrong U.S. Dietary Advice?

The science clearly showing how the “lipid theory of heart disease,” the belief that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease, is false, but that science can never be published or exposed by Big Pharma, Big Food, or the U.S. Government.

To do so would be to admit that such dietary advice, and the cholesterol lowering drugs that have earned them hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars, have been a scam and have led to increased rates of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.

The irony in all of this is that traditional saturated fats such as coconut oil, the most saturated dietary fat one can consume, has been shown to actually be heart healthy by numerous scientific studies.

Thank God for honest researchers such as Cristin E. Kearns, DDS, MBA; Laura A. Schmidt, PhD, MSW, MPH; and Stanton A. Glantz, PhD with the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California at San Francisco.

Their honest research provides the information the public needs to understand how government dietary advice is corrupt, and how to make intelligent choices when it comes to food and nutrition.

This information is increasingly being published in the alternative media, as the dinosaur corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media for the most part no longer represents the interest of the public, but instead the interest of their corporate sponsors dominated by Big Pharma and Big Food, and their incestuous ties to government regulatory agencies such as the FDA, USDA, and CDC.


If the British Royal Family aren't jewish then how would they fit in to the New World Order?
If the British Royal Family aren’t jewish then how would they fit in to the New World Order?

Source Article:
Is The British Royal Family Secretly Jewish?

The long term goal of multiculturalism is the genocide of White Nations to be replaced by a 99% coffee coloured, dumbed down, debt-slave race to serve a 1% jewish master race.

Bearing this in mind, would the British Royal Family really go along with the multicultural genocide of their own People if they aren’t jewish themselves? If the Royal Family aren’t jewish what role will they have in the multicultural rainbow Utopia of the future?

The British Royal Family. Do you really know whether they are White or jewish?

There have been widespread rumours since George 1 ( coronation 1714 ) that the British Royal Family are secretly jewish.

In 1694 the Bank of England was created giving control of the British money supply to several jewish banking families.

Seven years later in 1701 the Bevis Marks Synagogue was established in the City of London by the Bank of England.

The Bevis Marks synagogue in the City of London.

In 1714 the Hanoverian Royal Family were invited by the City of London to be the British Royal Family , the Hanoverian Royal Family later changed their family name to Windsor.

The Hanoverian Royal Family were originally a jewish family that claimed to have converted to Christianity in the 15th Century.

The Sovereign Bible that all British Kings and Queens use at their Coronation has been in Hebrew since 1714.

All British Monarchs have to attend secret ceremonies at the Bevis Marks Synagogue (established 1701) in the City of London the night before their Coronation , these ceremonies are always attended by Britains’ senior jews and bankers.

Renée and Naim Dangoor in conversation with Prince Charles in 2001 at the Bevis Marks synagogue.

Queen Victoria always claimed to be a direct descendent of jewish King David. Several items in the Crown Jewels are engraved with the Star of David.

In all Royal Palaces and other premises both Saturday and Sunday are treated equally as the Sabbath Day.

The Prince of Wales, Charles, was circumcised by Rabbi Jacob Snowman M.D, at the time the leading mohel in London and the circumciser to the Royal Family. This has long been a source of pride within the British jewish community.Rabbi Jacob Snowman M.D has only ever circumcised jewish patients.

All British Kings have been circumcised by jewish Doctors since 1714.

Jewish circumcision equipment.

Prince Charles has his own blue velvet kippa with a royal crest on it in silver to wear at jewish weddings , he also has other jewish regalia the exact purpose of which is not known.

At ALL synagogues in the UK two daily prayers are always held, one for the Royal Family and one for the State of Israel.
Princess Diana’s mother, Frances Shand Kydd, was jewish — born Frances Ruth Burke Roche, a Rothschild.

Frances Shand Kydd – the jewish mother of Princess Diana.

That is sufficient for Princess Diana to be certified as jewish, as well as her son, Prince William, the future King of England. This also makes Prince Harry jewish , it is believed his appearance in a Nazi uniform at a party in January 2005 was his confused reaction to realising he was jewish.

Prince Harry has firmly rejected his jewish roots.

Princess Kate’s mother, Carole Goldsmith (maiden name ) is the daughter of Ronald Goldsmith and Dorothy Harrison who were both jewish. That makes Carole Goldsmith jewish and, according to jewish law, her daughter Princess Kate Middleton would also be jewish.

Bearing this in mind that would make Prince William and Princess Kate’s baby boy Prince George born on 23rd July 2013 jewish as well.

Princess Kate, Prince William and Prince George. Are they kosher?

The Queen and her cousin Anthony Blunt. Blunt claimed the Royal Family were secretly jewish.

The Queen and her cousin Anthony Blunt. Blunt claimed the Royal Family were secretly jewish.

Articles on the British Royal Family being secretly jewish:

Wednesday, November 29, 2017


Source Article:
The Spiritual Link Between Alcohol Consumption And Demonic Possession

Alcohol consumption is widely accepted in our society, associated with partying, celebrations and events (such as weddings). Beer and liquor companies market their products with slick advertisements, portraying beautiful women, popularity and success.

While it is not only accepted, but legal to consume alcohol in the United States, there is a side to its consumption that is often overlooked, which is the spiritual consequences of drinking. Most Americans choose to turn a blind eye to any consequences that may result from the consumption of alcoholic beverages, and many of those that do acknowledge this reality see only the potential physical ramifications.

As a starting point, look at the roof of the world alcohol itself. “Alcohol” is derived from the Arabic “al-kuhl”, a word that means “body eating spirit”. This word is also the origin for the English word “ghoul.” Middle Eastern folklore tells of a ghoul as an evil demon, which was believed to consume human bodies, specifically children and stolen corpses.

Both “alcohol” and “alembic” are metaphors for aqua vitae, or “life water.” Also interesting to note, the world “spirit” refers to a distilled liquid, which can be traced back to Middle Eastern alchemy.

In alchemy, alcohol is used to extract the soul essence of an entity. Hence its’ use in extracting essences for essential oils, and the sterilization of medical instruments. By consuming alcohol into the body, it in effect extracts the very essence of the soul, allowing the body to be more susceptible to neighboring entities most of which are of low frequencies. (why do you think we call certain alcoholic beverages “SPIRITS”). That is why people who consume excessive amounts of alcohol often black out, not remembering what happened. This happens when the good soul (we were sent here with) leaves because the living conditions are too polluted and too traumatic to tolerate. The good soul jettisons the body, staying connected on a tether, and a dark entity takes the body for a joy ride around the block, often in a hedonistic and self serving illogical rampage. Our bodies are cars for spirits. If one spirit leaves, another can take the car for a ride.

Essentially when someone goes dark after drinking alcohol or polluting themselves in many other ways, their body often becomes possessed by another entity. Have you ever felt different, more sexual, more violent, less rational and less logical………after drinking alcohol? Are you aware we already live inside an ancient religious cult who are schooled concerning the dark powers of alcohol? It is this cult that popularizes alcohol, through the media and government it controls, to serve a very ancient and dark agenda.

The solutions to our crumbling society are only to be found within our non polluted collective humanity, not within modern science and the death cult it represents, Our dark and immoral human farmers masquerade as altruistic governments, who then serve us up to dark spiritual entities that feed off our energies when we consume alcohol and a host of other toxic substances they rain down from the top of the ruling pyramid. We’re slaves living on an elaborate control grid…..based on indoctrination, propaganda, chemical sedation, toxic medication and we’re even used as food energy for dark spirits who live outside the frequency of visible sight. I haven’t drank alcohol in almost 5 years. Now, the dark spirits are in fear of me and that’s the way it was always meant to be. Join the moral rebirth of humanity, unslave, reject the poison and lets get to work doing what we know has to be done.”

How Does This Relate to Our Society?

It is important that Americans take the time to consider the role that alcohol plays in their lives. While some may be able to distinguish between social drinking and a problem with substance abuse, others, who drink regularly, need to consider the fact that they may have a problem. How much drinking constitutes too much? How many people are actually just in denial?

Consider attending a social gathering with many new faces. Would you prefer that there be alcohol available, or would you be completely comfortable without it? Do you use alcohol as a crutch? Do you feel that you require alcohol to be confident?

When one relies heavily on alcohol to ‘be themselves’, the often cross a line becoming someone completely different than who they actually are to begin with. They may become violent, self destructive of sexually promiscuous. Are these changes in personality going to help you to bring positivity into the world? Are they manifestations of light and love?

There is no denying that there are serious physical effects on the body when one consumes large amounts of alcohol, including cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, stroke, high blood pressure, fibrosis or cirrhosis of the liver, alcoholic hepatitis and pancreatitis among others. However, it is also important for Americans to be familiar with the spiritual consequences that they may also be facing!

Saturday, November 25, 2017


This Israeli is speaking Truth! And since facebook deleted this post and banned me for posting it, I figured I MUST post it on my blog so that even MORE people will read this.

Source Article:
Jews are Responsible for Anti Semitism — Young Israeli

By Michael

I was born in Israel in 1985. My family are European Jews,

Ever since I was a young man I had an instinctive feeling that something is wrong in our world…

I was shocked to learn that Judaism was basically Satanic because it seeks to supplant God. Judaism was basically engaged in a tribal racist warfare against mankind. The Jewish religion teaches Jews to hate and fear non-Jews. This is the ultimate racism on the planet.

Satanism (Communism) is a tool of Jewish racism and enslavement.

Anti-Semitism is not a disease but rather a healthy reaction to the Satanic agenda of Organized Jewry (Zionism) who make up the “Illuminati”.

This unique combination of Jewish racism against gentiles and Jewish Satanism (Cabala) is the real cause of Anti-Semitism.

I always thought that non-Jews hated Jews for no reason like it’s in their blood, that Anti-semitism is just an irrational disease that gentiles suffer from. That’s what I was told…… I was shocked to see that Cabalist Jews control the International Banking, Media and the politics of much of the world and that these Jews are part of a racist Satanic cult. They are not uplifting mankind with their money power and media influence but instead degrading it so they are more easily controlled.

I soon realized that there a rational explanation and justification for Anti-Jewish feelings. I didn’t know that there was a Satanic element within Jewry that’s engaged in warfare against mankind and that’s ultimately causing Anti-Semitism. I had always believed that Jews were a tiny poor persecuted people who were hated for no reason. I didn’t realize that the Jewish grip over the western world was the reason why all Jews – including ordinary innocent Jews – were hated.


98% of Jews just want to be left alone and don’t desire the destruction of the European People. My Jewish friends are also puzzled by this suicidal behavior on the part of the White man for allowing migration. They don’t like the promotion of sickness and degeneracy and the vast majority of them certainly don’t desire the destruction of the European peoples. Like me, they were shocked that this was all promoted by International Jewish Organizations (International Jewry) and that their leaders are Satanists. I know the vast majority of us Jews are not in on it. But Organized Jewry along with Freemasonry is planning to enslave mankind and make us all (including ordinary Jews) slaves to Satan.


To break the endless cycle of Anti-Semitism we need speak out against the agenda of Organized Jewry and expose it to the light. The power of the light (Truth) will destroy it. How? Jews who are awakened to this agenda need to form groups first on the internet and then in the open and openly denounce Organized Jewry and Jewish anti-gentile racism for their Satanic agenda against mankind and especially the White Race.

Jews need to openly say that they want nothing to do with this agenda, as I want NOTHING to do with this evil agenda. Ordinary Jews need to boycott Holywood, the Jewish American Media and Anti-White Jewish Organizations such as AIPAC and the ADL and SPLC.

Ordinary Jews who just want to live a normal life must understand, that the entire suffering of the Jewish people is solely the result of the Anti-White, Anti-Gentile hatred racist agenda of their leaders, organized Jewry and the Jewish religion.

As long as the Anti-White, Anti-Gentile agenda of Organized Jewry continues, ordinary Jews will suffer physically and economically and mentally. You don’t have to suffer anymore! And you don’t have to make anyone else or any other people suffer either. White Gentiles aren’t your enemy! The enemy lies within your ranks! Expose it and destroy it for the sake of Jewish children and for the sake of mankind.


Jews in Israel are brainwashed 24/7 that everybody is about to get them, that Iran wants to exterminate Israel, that the rest of the world wants Israel and the Jews gone, that Anti-Semitism awaits us at every corner, and that we are powerless tiny country. This isn’t true. Israel has one of the greatest nuclear weapons arsenal in the world. We are the only country in the middle east with such capability and our nuclear missiles can reach any location and any capital on planet earth armed with 1-2 Megaton warheads. Israel is certainly not a powerless country as Jewish organizations would have you believe. This is all propaganda by Jewish organizations to make Jews unite against the Goyim and especially the Muslim world.


I believe that the Palestinians were treated wrongly by us when we stole their land in 1948. We were given other options to create an ethnic state for the Jewish people. So why is it that Israel was established? Israel was not created as a nation for the Jewish people but rather as a nuclear military base for the Jewish-Rothschild-Masonic NWO. The strategic location of Israel on between Europe, Asia and Africa was the reason for it, as well as it’s symbolic meaning for the NWO mafia. Israel was meant to be the capital of the Satanic NWO and the One World Government as one of the founders of Israel and a former prime minister David Ben Gurion said:

Israeli Supreme Court built with a globalist agenda in mind

“In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah…”


I wish all peoples and races to exist and be preserved in their own individual homelands and for people to respect the other in the same way they want to be respected and treated….Peoples must recognize their natural borders but at the same time the can and they should be friends and treat each other with respect and trade with each other…. not steal each other’s land, women and wealth.

The present situation in Europe isn’t going to create a better world, but a world of more hatred and division and war. What’s happening is unnatural. The only way people can love each other is if they respect each other and their differences. Destroying each other and displacing each other is a spiritual sin and what’s happening today against the European people by Muslim-African invasion is harmful and genocidal. White Genocide must be stopped and reversed !!! Non-Jewish Whites can take their homelands back. And they can do it easily!

To my fellow Jews I say:

Expose Jewish extremism, and Satanism promoted by Organized Jewry and Freemasonry. This is how anti-Semitism can end. Ordinary Jews MUST expose the agenda and say that WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

To Europeans, I say You must take your lands back! send the aliens back to their ancestral homelands! Be proud of your race and heritage as the world wouldn’t be the same without you! expose the politicians who had sold you out! Protect your race, your women and your children..Stop being Cucks!!!

Sunday, November 19, 2017


Source Article:

Growing up in a gardener’s household with a mother who fully expected to do her parents’ green-thumbs proud, I was exposed to many practices and ‘tricks of the trade’ concerning growing plants – both indoors and out. As a kid puttering around after my mom, and later as a young adult attempting to grow my own flowers, I applied many of the same techniques I had watched my mom apply without even knowing why I was doing so.

It wasn’t until I became a homeowner and truly began to claim the land as my own with larger garden beds that I became somewhat overwhelmed with why things worked how they did, or didn’t. Epsom salts had always played a role in gardening, although I never knew why, so I set out to find out the reasoning behind using them in the garden.

Epsom salts for plants have long been hailed as a gardeners best kept secret for generations, but what exactly is so great about using epsom salts in your garden?


To begin, I should probably explain what Epsom salts are. Epsom salts are actually a mineral compound of magnesium and sulfate- essential nutrients that regulate enzymes and are found naturally in most living things. Originally found in Epsom, England (hence the name), they are mined from the ground and have a variety of different uses ranging from healthy lifestyle choices, help with magnesium deficiencies, crafting projects, and in our case – gardening.

Epsom salts are not salts at all even though they look like it (it doesn’t have any sodium chloride in it’s makeup). Because of this, it can be used as a natural alternative in many agricultural and health practices without ill effects- since too much true salt is actually harmful to plants.


Magnesium sulfate is actually a key ingredient for vegetation and is found naturally in soils, although they can eventually be depleted and leach over time. The use of Epsom salts in varied ways can help give a very inexpensive boost to your plants and flowers year round – whether they are grown as indoor plants or out.

Essentially they are a building block of new growth, and is supportive of overall plant health; they can be used in a variety of ways to enhance seed germination, flower production, new growth, and can aide with chlorophyll creation: which is needed for photosynthesis in all green plants.



Seed germination is the process of when non-dormant seeds begin to grow into a plant. Sowing Epsom salts directly into the ground at a rate of one to two tablespoons for each hole when you begin to plan your garden will help ensure a greater percentage of seeds begins this process. Furthermore, magnesium builds up cell walls which also helps keep seedlings stronger and more readily available for nutrient uptake – resulting in stronger, healthier mature plants.


Plant roots don’t grow in search of nutrients, rather nutrients need to be in the soils surrounding the roots and come into contact with them in order to be taken up to feed the plant. These nutrients both help further root growth and plant growth above ground. As roots spread, they encounter more to continue the process, especially when you add in an additional ‘food supply’ for them to take in.

Occasionally nutrients leach through the soils, or washout of soils, causing roots unable to come in contact with these essential building blocks. Natural salts can also accumulate when this happens, which can inhibit nutrient uptake. Epsom Salts help loosen and breakdown salts, and adds back in some of the vitamins and minerals needs to keep your plants growing and healthy.


When any sort of plant is transplanted, whether from one place in your yard to another or from a pot to the ground, transplant shock is a common occurrence. Transplant shock occurs due to the disruption of the root system and the consequential failure of the roots to become established. When this occurs your plant will fail to thrive and may eventually die off, especially if the roots have not begun to grow before winter dormancy.

Most plants suffer from some form of transplant shock upon repotting, replanting, or moving; but with a minimal amount of care you can help alleviate this stress. For starters, providing Epsom salts to the bottom of your transplant holes will ensure there are readily available nutrients upon planting. Keeping your new plant well watered is also essential, and adding in epsom salts to your water every two weeks for the first few months will help keep a new plant from failing to thrive.


Magnesium, produces chlorophyll; chlorophyll is the green pigment that is essential for the process of photosynthesis: the process in which carbon dioxide is taken from the air and converted into oxygen and glucose (plant food) in all green plants. Chlorophyll makes this conversion possible using sunlight, and when chlorophyll is lacking, your plant leaves will begin to yellow and wither, upon which the plant will begin to suffer as it receives less nutrients from the sun and is dependent only upon what is stored in the roots.


Although Epsom salts do dissolve in water, in drier climate (where they are less likely to wash away as readily) they can be quite useful when spread around the surface of the soils in your garden and around the base of your plants. These crystallized minerals are similar in nature to Diatomaceous Earth, and make it pretty uncomfortable for garden pests to cross onto a plant from the ground since it will cut up their soft bodies and exoskeletons, causing them to dehydrate and die.


The production of fruits and vegetables are actually how plants reseed themselves. Therefore this is a very taxing process since essentially what is occurring is what should lead to the end of the growth cycle for the plant as they mature their seeds and then die. Modern agriculture has hybridized and changed how these plants produce to yield larger crops for human consumption, and they truly do need more of a food supply than what would normally be found in the ground in order to keep producing.

Applying Epsom salts regularly will help from the start of the germination process as mentioned above, and continue to feed the plant with regular applications so larger, sweeter, and more abundant, healthy fruits and vegetables can make their way to your table.


Applying Epsom salts as a general fertilizer will boost your soil magnesium and sulfur where needed. You can apply this in a few ways: either by mixing it into the soil with a fertilizer as an added boost upon initial planting, or mixing it into water at a ratio of one to three tablespoons per one gallon of water and using the mixture to water your plants with. You can also mix it directly into the soil around the base of the plant at a ratio of one tablespoon per one foot of plant height.

This is especially important in gardens where you need to produce a yield of flowers, fruits, and vegetables. Whereas certain plants can tolerate low magnesium, other suffer when it is lacking- and this can be seen when the plant leaves begin to turn yellow on the edges and a yellow arrow shaped pattern appears in the center. Plants lacking in sulfur will have younger leaves yellowing and browning, occasionally followed by older leaved. Either deficiency will affect your bloom rate, as well as any sort of produce set you were expecting.


Magnesium can also be taken up through the leaves of a plant, and can be used a foliar spray throughout the life of your plant as a general maintenance measure. Many plants benefit from a regular application of a Epsom salt spray, and can aide in the overall health and amount of produce grown in vegetable gardens.

This application is best used when you mix a ratio of two tablespoons per gallon of water and apply at least once a month to blooming plants beginning after blooms appear. If you plant is showing low magnesium stress as described above, it’s best to mix into the soils itself.


Epsom salt applications cause bigger bud sets and more vigorous blooms in flowering plants. Most flowers begin to suffer from a magnesium deficiency during bloom, so the regular use of them in watering or foliar application can help keep your plant flowering longer, and recover more quickly if it is a continual bloomer.

This is never more so than in roses as they use a large amount of nutrients setting their large flowers; and Epsom salts help build lush, dark foliage as well. The increase in the production of chlorophyll in sun loving plants feeds the entire plant, and roses, especially those that set multiple times in a season, will keep providing an abundance of new growth and bed sets for as long as they can.

There are a few key guidelines to consider for optimal use: work epsom salts into the soil at least once a year surrounding plants, and then provide a good feeding of dissolved application upon planting when dealing with new vegetation.


Potted plants can occasionally start to have a buildup of natural salts through the watering and draining cycle. When this occurs soils will begin to bind and roots will struggle with both water and nutrient uptake. Epsom salts will help breakup natural salts and will improve the plant’s overall health through this process.

Mix a two tablespoon to one gallon of water ratio to water your plants with once a month with it. This will easily take care of any salt buildup and also provide aide for more vigorous growth. Just remember – plants need good sunlight to best utilize Epsom salts, so keep your houseplants in an area where they will receive either good direct, or indirect sunlight depending on their needs to best utilize this application.


Almost all vegetable plants benefit from an application of Epsom salts, but none more so than tomatoes and peppers which are both naturally magnesium deficient. Tomatoes like both the magnesium and sulfur, which helps prevent blossom end rots in all vegetables (squash varieties included). Roots reach deep, foliage will darken, and fruits will sweeten when you both plant your veggies in the spring with a soil mixture, and then follow up every two weeks with a watering solution.
You can also apply a foliar spray, but be sure to do it when you know it can dry to avoid dampening the foliage too much, or too often.


Even though Epsom salts feed all vegetation, it has been hailed as a good weed killer when mixed with other ingredients. A gallon of white vinegar, two cups Epsom salt, and a cup of blue Dawn dish soap when mixed and sprayed on a plant will cause the vegetation on a plant to wither fairly effectively. For a more lasting effect, if you heat the solution in advance to a boiling point and then pour over the weeds this should also ensure the roots are scorched past redemption.


Hopefully this was a help to those of you (like me) who were wondering how Epsom salts worked in the garden and why you should use them. Having begun the application to my roses and veggies this summer, I was shocked at the differences I saw in my plants. My floribunda roses set bloom after bloom continuously through the summer (I also used a rose fertilizer once a month in the soil), and my tomatoes took over (literally) the garden and grew to over 6 feet tall and 8 feet wide (I had to use hog panel to support it). We actually named the Roma, Earl, and Earl produced over 200 fruits this season, with green ones still set until frost.

If you have any questions or comments, or have found yet another way to utilize Epsom salts in you yard, we want to hear from you! Please leave us a message below, and as always, share!

Tuesday, November 14, 2017


What a potent article!!! This is what organized jewry has done to Germany. This is what the jewish EU is bringing to Europe as a means of wiping out the white population. I pray with every fiber of my being that all of this turns against them and that it will soon be they who are erased from our Earth. I, for one, have had enough of their evil.

Source Article:
A Female Doctor Working in Germany Warns the World