Monday, January 26, 2015

IN THE WORDS OF A RITUAL CIRCUMCISER



"But the mohel (circumciser) with whom I had worked countless times suddenly handed me the knife. He pointed to my squirming son, whose hands and legs were tied to the board. The foreskin had been pulled up over the glans of the penis and was now protruding through a narrow slit of the small, stainless steel clamp. . . . 'It's the greatest honor a father can have,' he added. . . . There is no greater primal anger than that caused by seeing another male in carnal contact with your wife, in this case the physical intimacy of mother and son. And there is no greater primal envy than that caused by looking down at the person who was brought into the world specifically to be your survivor. . . . The breast provides, but the knife protects. It channels the father's natural anger and jealousy into one controlled cut. He takes off one small part in order to preserve -- and love -- the whole. . . . No father should be denied this experience, even vicariously, of inflicting upon his child a ritualized blow so intense as to make him both shake and recoil . . ."


Birth Rite by Joshua J. Hammerman
THE NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, March 13, 1994.
http://www.cirp.org/pages/cultural/hammerman/

Saturday, January 24, 2015

BIRTH TRAUMA & THE DARK SIDE OF MODERN MEDICINE

Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack our Souls




"This is one of the most important books published in this century... PLEASE, those of you preparing to birth, those of you who already have, those of you preparing to become Nurses or Midwives, those of you who are not aware of the psychological affect the birthing process (as it is conducted today) has on our entire societal structure - read this major work. It will hold you spellbound. This book is not only for women, but for men as well who sometimes suffer post stress syndrome after the birth of their children. Understanding this book will help you understand the depth of dis-function families suffer, and why. Jeanice Barcelo's book is a monumental contribution to our culture."
-- Rev. Marian Adams


Dear Friends — It is with great excitement that I share with you about the completion of my first book entitled “Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine: Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack our Souls.” In this book, I expose the violence of western medicine through the sharing of many personal stories of severe birth trauma combined with little known information about the cult of modern medicine, including the mind control of medical students who are forced to engage in atrocities in order to become official members of the cult.

The book also covers a wide array of topics including birth rape, circumcision, abuse in neonatal intensive care units, cesarean section, induction of labor, the dangers of drugs like cytotec, pitocin, and epidural anesthesia during labor, and even a section about the dark side of artificial reproductive technologies and the pain of IVF children. Additionally, the book contains rarely discussed information about prenatal trauma and the impact of the first nine months on the rest of our lives.

The book is an intense read but the revelations presented are so important that I hope many people will read it.

I would like to ask for your help today as I seek to raise money to cover the costs for promotion and marketing of my book and to assist in the purchase of as many paperback copies as possible. I would like to have the paperback copies on hand so that I might offer personally signed copies to my biggest fans. I would also like to give some copies as gifts to the incarcerated men here on Long Island that have participated in my parenting classes (which is a completely volunteer effort on my part).

There are several ways you can contribute to helping me move this information out there.

1. Purchase a copy of the PDF version of the book right now for $11.99 by following this link, and purchase one for your friends and family members too!






2. Preorder a copy of the paperback through me (rather than through Amazon) for $17.99 (plus shipping) and as soon as the paperbacks are in my hand, I will mail you your copy (should be within 2-4 weeks). You can pre-order the paperback by clicking here:
http://birthofanewearth.com/?p=3790



3. Donate a minimum of $25 to support my work and you will immediately receive a PDF copy of the book sent directly to their email.


4. Donate a minimum of $100 and you will receive a personally signed copy of the paperback within the next 4-6 weeks.


5. Donate $200 or more and you will receive a personally signed copy of the paperback and have the option of scheduling a private skype session with me for the healing of prenatal or birth trauma.


Donations can be made here:







THANK YOU FOR BEING PART OF MY COMMUNITY AND PART OF THE WAVE OF CHANGE THAT IS DESTINED TO TRANSFORM THE WORLD!


May this book reach millions of people and their lives be forever transformed.


Thank you for your support. Wishing you all good things and may this year be the best year yet.




PS – here is a beautiful review of my book from my esteemed friend, John Kaminski.


Medical monsters turn joy into horror

Greedy doctors' focus on profit destroys mother-child bonding


A review of
Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine
Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack Our Souls
By Jeanice Barcelo, M.A.,
http://birthofanewearth.com


By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.org/en/kaminski


Is the world going mad and are people a lot more unhappy than they should be because of the barbaric way doctors treat mothers when they deliver their babies?

Jeanice Barcelo's gut wrenching indictment of the way hospitals and doctors brutally manipulate pregnant mothers in Birth Trauma, and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, Exposing the Systematic Violence Against Women and Infants During Hospital Birth insists this interference in the mother/child bond is a key element in the breakdown of human love worldwide.

The medical profession has its own rules about delivering babies, and the way Barcelo tells it, these methods not only create lasting scars in mothers, destroy many marriages and unnecessarily injure and kill children. They also leave a great uninvestigated tragedy of infants who do not properly bond with their mothers as a result of medical expedience more interested in profitable procedures than in healthy children.

Its effect on the world — but most especially on women and children, she insists — is catastrophic.

Ordinary readers, especially men brave enough to tackle the subject, will view with unadulterated horror the things that are done to babies in the name of keeping them healthy. Like screwing fetal heart monitors into their skulls. Or memory block drugs used for a variety of purposes including sexual molestation.

"Doctors don't care if mom and the baby are damaged"

Barcelo calls this birth trauma a hidden epidemic, and cites a 1995 study that determined 95 percent of all births in the U.S. were considered traumatic, 45% severely traumatic. The Centers for Disease Control, she says, are responsible for causing the deaths of thousands of unborn babies, because vaccinations cause a massive spike in fetal deaths.

An increasing number of birthing mothers recall their experiences as "birth rape", and following the extreme level of abuse they receive in hospitals, post traumatic stress afflicts many of them.

The level of malfeasance Barcelo itemizes in her examples of women giving birth reveals a glossary of horrors facing every woman who plans to have her baby delivered in a hospital.

The most magic moment of every mother's life is turned into a nightmare by cash conscious doctors who misuse drugs not meant for childbirth to trigger induction — forcibly ejecting babies from the womb at the profound cost of severing the psychological bond between mother and child and predisposing that child to both afflictions and addictions later in life that need not otherwise occur.

The cost to society is extraordinary, tragic and mostly unacknowledged, the author stresses.

"The core of our pain starts at childbirth. It's about our own mothers handing over their power" to a conscienceless machine that rings babies through a medical cash register which simply doesn't treat them as the supremely sensitive and vulnerable human beings they are.

"They are birthing babies in violence and leaving infants alone at the gate in nurseries of horror, all done for power and gain.

"Knock 'em out and pull 'em out — it has all the elements of rape," says Barcelo, who herself has experienced five traumatic pregnancies that provided her with firsthand knowledge of how this miracle of birth is turned into a nightmare by the heavy handed processes used in for-profit hospitals.

Central to the tragedy is the use of epidural drugs, which accelerate the birth process. These cut off mothers' conscious contact with their babies and not only deprive them of the most special moments of their lives as mothers, but sabotage the bond with their child for life.

'Pit to distress'

Barcelo cites two main drugs as the major culprits in ruining the birth experience: cytotec (an ulcer drug) and pitocin, neither of which are recommended for use in labor but are widely used to hasten the contrived necessity of Cesarean section surgeries.

"We have the highest C-Section rate in the world because these drugs cut off oxygen to the babies and disrupt bonding and breastfeeding. Both drugs are linked to oxycodone addiction late in life as well as autism."

The use of pitocin, Barcelo explains, is often referred to as "pit to distress", or to deliberately put the baby in danger to more quickly necessitate the C-section option, which many mothers describe as not giving birth at all, but to having their baby stolen from them.

Also hair trigger decisions to abandon efforts to keep babies alive in Barcelo's experience are really often fictitious brain death diagnoses that enable lucrative organ harvesting.

And the damage is not only to mother and child, but also to fathers, as it was for one dad who "lost my connection to my wife that I never regained" for what was perceived as failure to protect his wife when doctors induced a C-section without parental permission. The PTSD that often comes with trauma not only afflicts babies and their mothers, but also distraught dads.

But the pain of accelerating the birth process is more than emotional, as the testimony of a mother who tried to give birth at home but was forced to call paramedics vividly attests. Doctors routinely inject paralytic drugs but often don't use anesthetics on patients they don't like to punish them for being recalcitrant. One woman Barcelo quotes describes how she was given an incredibly painful C-section without anesthesia, but being paralyzed, was unable to protest.

"The torture of infants and mothers happens regularly," Barcelo writes matter-of-factly.

Bowels of the technological underworld

Barcelo writes:

"Worst of all in the fact that C-sectioned babies often end up in neonatal intensive care units, and those born before 39 weeks are twice as likely as those born vaginally to be kept in a NICU due to respiratory distress. Once a baby ends up in the NICU, the possibility for healthy bonding is further degraded.

"NICUs are like the bowels of the technological underworld. They are places where infants are literally held captive for weeks and months, and subjected to all manner of painful and tortuous medical procedures, most of the time without being given any kind of pain relief whatsoever."

Once a baby gets into an NICU, she is subjected to 14 to 21 invasive procedures per day, all without anesthesia, and the parents have no say over the treatment, nor can they remove their child from the NICU. The experience of pain, Barcelo writes, completely changes the wiring of the brain in adulthood.

The story of Andrew and his five months of torture plus his $100,000 medical bill that preceded his death will curl your toenails, guaranteed.

"Babies are being used for medical experiments," Barcelo writes. One government study that included data from Wake Forest and Yale universities involved deliberately depriving babies of oxygen to observe the results, which very often was death.

Barcelo reserves special scorn for the use of ultrasound frequencies, which are extremely dangerous to babies. "To me," Barcelo writes, "this indicates a distinct level of evil within the medical profession. It is a clear indication that they are willing and able to deliberately cause harm."

The lie that babies don't feel pain

Of all of the horrific descriptions Barcelo has put forth in her descriptions of the barbaric birth process, the one that rattled this reviewer the most was the widespread practice of medical procedures on babies based on the principle that babies do not feel pain.

A woman demanded to see hospital records after her son's death in 1985. She said, 'Somehow it was possible for professionals who perceived a baby as too fragile to tolerate general anesthesia to perceive that same infant as able to withstand open-chest surgery without pain relief. . . .' At two weeks (old), during his hour and half operation, Jeffrey had two holes cut on either side of his neck and one in his chest, he was cut from his breastbone around to his backbone, his flesh lifted aside, ribs pried apart, blood vessels tied off and lungs retreated, tissue stitched together and a 'stab incision' to secure chest tubes. He died a few days later as a result of the shock that overwhelmed his entire system causing his brain to bleed and his organs to fail. The hospital's senior neonatologist responded to his mother's inquiries by stating 'it didn't matter because he was a fetus,' explaining that children less than 2 years of age do not feel pain . . .

"Such is the arrogance and extreme insanity of esteemed members of the medical profession who have continued to insist for more than 100 years that babies do not feel pain," Barcelo writes.

She also is on top of the latest bogus claim by the CDC that infant circumcision will prevent HIV when an avalanche of medical research claims the opposite. Barcelo blames the CDC pronouncement on "a well orchestrated media campaign by the Jews" that enables doctors to continue the most common surgery in America be performed on babies without anesthesia.

Even disregarding the savage practice of Jewish rabbis, studies have shown that ordinary circumcision trauma lasts a lifetime.

In addition, African countries have the highest rate of circumcision and the highest rate of HIV. And in Norway, the only country that records the circumcision status of rapists, the 2 percent of the population who are circumcised commit 80 percent of the rapes.

So how does the medical system do it? How do they turn good and decent people into biological robots who parrot nonsense and can't seem to think for themselves? The answer lies in the indoctrination process is set-up to systematically break down the morality and the will of medical students, and, if all goes according to plan, will cause a split in their psyche that will result in dissociation and the assimilation of an alter personality that will be willing to conform to medical norms.

The horrors in these satanic birth factories seem to go on forever.

• Cells from aborted babies are also being used for "flavor enhancing research" by companies like Senomyx and residue from aborted babies can be found in products made by Pepsi, Nestle, Kraft, and Campbell, all of whom have hired Senomyx to do their "flavor enhancing research".

• Israel is on the cutting edge of this Luciferian technology and it is involved in something called "post mortem sperm retrieval," which involves harvesting sperm from dead men.

And lastly,

According to Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year neonatologist exposing the dark side of organ donation, "brain death" is a completely fictitious diagnosis conjured up by the underworld demigods for purposes of finding a way to legalize the harvesting of organs while people are still very much alive. Organ donation in the U.S. is an extremely dark business, with living people being wheeled into operating rooms and having their chests cleaved open and their organs removed one at a time at the hands of medical sadists . . . The organ removal is done without anesthesia in the U.S., but with the victims instead being given paralysis drugs so that they cannot move or scream while they are being tortured and murdered by medical doctors.

"Many people now allege that the CDC's real purpose is genocide and depopulation, and that vaccines are biological weapons purposefully being used to create mass sterilization, disease and death. These programs are being used to deliberately depopulate the Earth, Barcelo insists, pointing out the chart on www.deagel.com that forecasts a drop in the U.S. population from 316 million to 69 million by 2025."

Jeanice Barcelo comes through a tragic lineage of the haunted womb, from a mother and grandmother who never bonded with their children. In reporting that 75% of mothers have received an epidural during labor prior to birthing their children, she is in a sad majority of children who did not receive the love they should have when they first appeared in the world.

That means that three quarters of the children who are born in this country do not receive the optimum amount of love from their mothers that they rightfully should, and looking at the world around us, the sad result of that tragedy is all too clear.

For more information about or to purchase a copy of Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, go to http://birthofanewearth.com.



John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.org/en/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/





Pre-publication PDF Version Available Now

To purchase the PDF version for the low price of $11.99, simply click on the following link. Your book will be sent to the email address you use to make the purchase.





CONSCIOUS CONCEPTION AND THE HEALING OF OUR SOULS


Jeanice Barcelo - Conscious Conception
http://youtu.be/ZRrXUnhEweM


Prenatal life is the basis for the health of body, mind, and spirit. Prenatal experiences lay the foundation for our understanding of relationship and human love. The consciousness of the parents during conception, whether they want to bring a baby into this world or not, whether they love each other, etc. - all of this has an impact on the baby. Every experience the child has in the womb will shape that child's physical health as well as his/her spiritual awareness, personality, and emotions throughout life. What passes for "prenatal care" in our society is nothing less than trauma-based mind control designed to break our children's link with the Divine Mind. This material is rarely, if ever, discussed and yet the truth is, conscious conception should be the focus of our solution for society. If we want to change the world, we must change how we create life and how we give birth. With awareness, intention, and love we can co-create reality with our children and our children's children to see a magnificent tomorrow. This is an amazing interview with Jeanice Barcelo, Freeman Fly, and Jamie Hanshaw. Not to be missed. For Part 2 of this interview, see: http://freemantv.com/conscious-conception-jeanice-barcelo/

Friday, January 23, 2015

JOIN ME AT THE FREE YOUR MIND CONFERENCE IN APRIL 2015



Dear friends - I am so pleased to announce that I will be speaking at the ‪Free Your Mind 3 Conference‬ this coming April, 2015, in Philadelphia, PA. The line-up of speakers is amazing and they include Fritz Springmeier, Lenon Honor, Freeman Fly, Bob Tuskin, Mark Passio, Jay Parker, Stewart Swerdlow, Josie the Outlaw, Laura Eisenhower, and many other incredible people who are bringing truth to Mankind! It's time to break free from the mind control! Please consider attending this conference. I would love to meet you in person. Get a $15 discount on tickets by typing "Barcelo" as the promo code at checkout. I hope to see you there!!


FREE YOUR MIND returns to Philadelphia in 2015 with a three-day conference featuring top-caliber whistle-blowers and researchers from across the country who will shed light upon our world’s problems and bring forward empowering solutions.

LEARN MORE HERE: http://freeyourmindconference.com/

Thursday, January 22, 2015

HOW TO BREASTFEED APPROPRIATELY -- HILARIOUS!!!



Source Article:
How to Breastfeed Appropriately
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bunmi-laditan/how-to-breastfeed-appropriately_b_5530806.html

So you've decided to breastfeed. Fantastic! Breastfeeding is a wonderful way to nourish your baby while establishing early bonding. Unfortunately, breast milk comes out of breasts so there are a few ground rules that we need to cover.

As you know, (female) modesty is a highly protected value in modern society. Unless you're a magazine cover model or in a music video, exposing your female udder flesh is entirely inappropriate. Science has proven that breasts are basically large vaginas. Only you and your partner should ever see them. Just because your breast-ginas are full of milk, doesn't mean you get to wave them around.

"I don't expose much when I breastfeed." This is a common excuse made by exhibitionist mothers. Just knowing that your nipples may become visible at any time is offensive and a temptation to married or newly engaged men.

Real life stories:

"I saw a woman breastfeeding in a park and was overcome with desire. I left my wife the same day." - John, 34, Nebraska

"I was a married man with eight kids. Last month I saw a woman nursing her infant at a park. I am now married to her." - Luke, 45, South Dakota

"Two years ago I was a successful business executive handling important transactions. Then I saw a breastfeeding mother. I became obsessed with nipples and lost my job. I can't make ends meet." - Anthony, 45

None of us would urinate in public (sober), so please show us the same courtesy and release your mommy nectar out of sight.

Note: Peeing in public and breastfeeding in public are identical because in both cases liquid is coming out. Crying in public is different because it's happening above the neck. If you can breastfeed out of your eye sockets, be my guest.

Here are a few tips that mothers should and need to adopt to help the rest of us feel comfortable.

Tip #1: Use a cover. Every time. There are many fancy ones on the market. Damask. Lace-trimmed. Or how about a swaddling cloth (if it's good enough to warm the baby Jesus, it's good enough for your kid)? Statistics show that human beings love being in confined spaces. Babies are on their way to becoming full humans, so this applies to them as well. I personally eat many of my meals under a loosely draped fitted sheet in my bedroom and find it quite enjoyable.

Please do not use summer as an excuse to flash your flesh-toned milk bags. Just last week I ate an entire Italian sub under a handmade quilt in 90 degree weather skin-to-skin with a close friend to simulate summer breastfeeding. Were we hot? Yes. Were we uncomfortable? Yes. Did one of us briefly lose consciousness? Yes. Did we subject anyone to seeing nipples? NO.

Do not be fooled, the importance of air circulation has been exaggerated by politicians. Ten out of 10 babies reported loving the sensation of breathing repeat CO2. There are women who can breastfeed without anyone knowing what they're doing. If they can do it, so can you because all babies are the same.

If you have a rebellious/bad child who pulls your cover off in a desperate attempt to breathe fresh air and see the world around them, consider some home training. It's your job to teach them right from wrong. Should your original sin infant not respond to discipline and still reach out for new oxygen, place two little straws in their nose scuba-style so that cool air can be retrieved from under a burlap cover without making us all barf from the sight of your boob flesh.

Care about decency? Go the extra mile and prevent wind from flying up and exposing your naked nipples by sewing small weights into the corners of your nursing cover.

Tip #2: Use a bathroom. Who doesn't love a public restroom? They're full of exotic scents and sounds! The next time your needy baby starts fussing for a taste of chest drippings, run to the nearest stall or city outhouse.

Nursing standing up while trying to avoid bacteria and holding a wriggling child has the added benefit of strengthening your core muscles. That postpartum tummy will be gone before you know it, making you more attractive to the general public. It's summer, after all -- bikini season!

No hook for the diaper bag? Put it on the floor or in the sink. When you get home, wipe it down with a bleach and water solution to remove any fecal matter.

If you've used your uterus more than once and have a second, or worse, third child in tow, ask the critters to join you in the stall for their safety. It's like a party! Don't worry, if you've raised them right they won't touch anything.

Considerate babies nurse for between 10-15 minutes, so you'll be out of there before you know it. If you've been cursed with a baby who nurses for 20 minutes or more at a time, cut them off when you see fit. That will teach them to speed things up. Keep track of their best times on your iPhone and give them small rewards (like a hug or kiss on the temple) for shaving off minutes.

Children are meant to be seen and not heard, but if you're rude enough to bring a baby to a public eatery, it's your responsibility to leave the table for the bathroom to nurse. Your meal will be waiting when you return. If your appetite is affected by the smell of light sewage, consider the fantastic weight-loss ramifications and be grateful. You're going to look great in that bikini!

The message is simple: whatever you are doing in public, drop it to move to a private area. Shopping? Return to your vehicle. At a remote park? Find an abandoned train car. Think about others.

Tip #3: When you leave the house, switch to bottles. If your baby hasn't used them before, shame on you for not preparing your infant for the real world. Everyone knows that it is very simple for babies to switch between the breast and bottles and won't at all impact his or her ability to continue breastfeeding in a socially appropriate setting (your bedroom in the dark).

Pumping breast milk is simple, fast and easy. Capable moms know how to squirt out a gallon of milk in under seven minutes. When you need to leave the house, just grab some of your fridge emissions! If your breasts become painfully engorged or hard to the touch from skipping feedings, take comfort in knowing that you're doing this for mankind's comfort level.

Formula is also available and not expensive.

Bottles also give other people a chance to feed the baby. Stop being selfish and hogging all of the feedings with your teats. Having a baby is about letting other people feel good. Pass it around like a football and watch the compliments roll in!

If your baby refuses the bottle, just keep pressing. You'll break their spirit eventually. If not, see tip #4.

Tip #4: Stay home. It would be easier for you and all of us if you just spent the day in your private dwelling. Not forever. Just until your baby learns to take a bottle or eat food that doesn't come out of your privates. There's lots to do in a home: television, hanging out in the backyard (don't nurse there unless you have a high enough wall -- again, RESPECT), cooking, cleaning, laundry and of course, Facebook. Please don't post photos of yourself breastfeeding on the Internet. The last thing anyone on the Internet wants to see are female breasts in an innocent context. We find this disgusting.

Tip #5: Get some morals. Do you have sex in public? No. Then why would you pull out your SEX BREASTS for your baby in public? Just because something is natural, doesn't mean we all want to see it. Yes, we will tolerate a celebrity nip slip or areola display. Yes, there are breasts splashed all over magazine racks and on television bouncing up and down to pop music, but that's different. We're OK with boobs if money has been exchanged. Has your cheap baby paid you? No? Then wrap it up.

In conclusion, breastfeeding in public is for lazy, exhibitionist, thrill-seeking, husband-stealing mothers who have nothing better to do than to make the rest of us shrivel in disgust. So cover it up. Love, Us.

PUTIN SUPPORTS GIVING LAND FOR FREE TO RUSSIAN PEOPLE -- RINGING CEDARS VISION COMING INTO FORM



Source Article:
Homestead Act for Russian Far East – Putin supports free land handout
http://rt.com/politics/224099-russia-land-free-east/

The Russian president has approved the idea to offer large land plots for free to anyone who resettles to the Russian Far East to start a farm or other business.

The initiative was first voiced by the deputy PM and presidential envoy to the Far East Federal District, Yuri Trutnev, who said that such a step would “strengthen the tendency of people’s migration to the Far East,” Interfax reported.

Trutnev told reporters that Putin called the idea right in principle and noted that similar programs had been successfully implemented in Siberia historically. Putin urged all responsible officials to be precise and cautious when detailing the conditions for land ownership, however.

Trutnev’s initial suggestion was to “create a mechanism for the free allocation of a 1 hectare (2.5 acres) plot of land to every resident of the Far East and to anyone who is willing to come and live in the region so that they could start a private business in farming, forestry, game hunting or some other enterprise.”

He added that the agreement could be signed for five years, and then it should either enter full force if the new landlord follows the plan, or be declared void if the land is not used. He also added that corruption in the process of distribution can be prevented if the land plots are far from big cities with their well-developed infrastructure and competitive environment.

The scheme has been designed to limit the possible selling of the land plots to foreign companies and individuals, Trutnev said. “We will give it a try,” he said. “I think this measure will prove to be effective.”

The Far East Federal District is a huge territory, uniting nine federal regions with a total area of over 6 million square kilometers. Included in the Far East are the gold-rich Magadan Region and the diamond-mining Sakha-Yakutiya republic, as well as important seaports and salmon-rich rivers. The district borders China by land and Japan and Alaska by sea.


Saturday, January 17, 2015

VACCINES PROVEN TO CAUSE SUDDEN INFANT DEATH IN CHILDREN




Source Article:
Vaccines Proven To Cause Sudden Death in Children – 67 Deaths Only Explicable As Caused By Vaccines – Drug Safety Regulators Had The Information for Over 2 Years And Let Children Die
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2015/01/13/vaccines-proven-to-cause-sudden-death-in-children-67-deaths-only-explicable-as-caused-by-vaccines-drug-safety-regulators-had-the-information-for-over-2-years-and-let-children-die/


This confirmation vaccines cause children to die suddenly is only hours old and is conclusive. There is no room for argument. It was published today on the US National Library of Medicine’s website.

For decades regulators and public health officials have insisted parents were wrong to blame vaccines when their children died suddenly shortly after vaccination. It was coincidence they would say – nothing more.

The deaths were no more than the number usually to be expected they would add.

But all the time drug safety regulators appear to have been holding the evidence.

A confidential 1271 page GSK document ordered recently by an Italian Court to be published shows that multiple vaccines cause sudden child deaths. [The document is a formal confidential previously unpublished submission by GlaxoSmithKline to the European Medicines Agency from 2011 and 2012.]

The GSK document contains data about deaths occurring as a result of administration of Prevenar 13 vaccine [from Pfizer], Infanrix Hexa from GSK and some other vaccines. Prevenar 13 is given to all British children.

In the past few hours the analysis has been published on the US National Library of Medicines website using the data GSK provided to the European Medicines Agency. The data is conclusive. It is very clear and there is no room for argument.

And the analysis is simple. Anyone can understand it. The very plain data the document contains proves the matter without any doubt whatsoever.

Here is the key point from the published analysis [but there is more to read online]. It is not rocket science but very simple to understand:

(Source: Table 36 The GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance report to Regulatory Authority)…… if one analyses the data looking at deaths in first 10 days after administration of vaccine and compares it to the deaths in the next 10 days, it is clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the first 10 days and 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days. Had the deaths been coincidental SIDS deaths unrelated to vaccination, the numbers of deaths in the two 10 day periods should have been the same. Similarly in children older than 1 year, 87.5% deaths (7 deaths) occurred in the first 10 days and 12.5% (1 death) occurred in the next 10 days.

Here is the data presented in a way that the clustering of deaths can be seen clearly [click on the table to open a larger version in a new window:



The clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination demonstrates a link between the vaccination and the sudden deaths. It indicates this is not by chance as otherwise the deaths would be spread across the entire 20 days. Rather than showing the total deaths each day, GlaxoSmithKline disguised the clustering of deaths around vaccination. They did this by listing the cumulative number of deaths. So by day 19 after vaccination GSK’s total was 67 deaths. But there had only been two deaths in those last 10 days and not 67. In contrast 65 deaths occurred on the first day of vaccination up to the 10th day following vaccination.
And here you can see GSK’s Table 36. The way it is prepared disguises the clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination – the total cumulative number of deaths up to 10 days from vaccination is 65. That number over the next 10 days increases by only 2. So in 10 days there were 65 deaths and between day 11 to day 20 after vaccination there were only another two deaths. So only the vaccine can be the cause of this:


TABLE 36 20111216 GSK Infanrix Hexa Summary Bridging Report 16-12-2011

Here is a serious issue. This kind of information is routinely provided to regulators like the MHRA but never made public. On the one occasion such a document is published as a result of the actions of a judge in an Italian Court it is possible to show beyond any doubt that multiple vaccines cause sudden deaths in children.

This appears a serious failing of European regulators.

All the EU regulators including the MHRA have had this information for at least three years and failed to act on it.

Further, the MHRA has an agreement with the drug industry not to publish information like this despite the provisions of the UK Freedom of Information Act.

And here is an example of how slanted news reporting is. The following report is not an independent objective balanced report of the facts:

‘Doctor Claims That Hexavalent Infanrix Vaccine Causes Sudden Death Of Babies,’ Anti-Vaccination Advocates Question Why Report Was Confidential

It is by someone called Dawn Papple apparently from the Greater Detroit Area USA who lists her working activities as Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Graphic Designer, Independent Contractor.

This appears to be a somewhat racist press report, referring to the information being just from India and “the doctor from Delhi” [as if we can all ignore it] and claims the issue is being raised by “anti-vaccine” proponents. It does not address properly the safety of children nor does it contain any proper overview of the real risks of disease for children against the risks of vaccines nor why there are real causes for concern.

There is clearly an intentional bias. Criticising the original edition of this CHS article, prior to this revision to review Popple’s report, Popple states:

The doctor who analyzed the data did not state that there was no room for argument, though. He did not brazenly state that the hexavalent Infanrix vaccine causes sudden death in babies.

It may not have been “brazen” as Popple writes emotionally, but it does look like he did and Popple knows that. She wrote earlier in the article that the doctor stated:

this demonstrates a link between the vaccination event and the sudden deaths.”

Dawn Popple does not question whether the information GSK provided is reliable and downplays the way GSK disguised the clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination stating, as if it were the wrong approach [emphasis added]:

Rather than compounding the total deaths each day, as in the documents found online, the pediatrics doctor suggests we examine how many more deaths happened right after the vaccine was given compared to as the days went by. He said this demonstrates a link between the vaccination event and the sudden deaths.

A substantial omission from Dawn Popple’s article is she does not discuss that GSK has been caught, found guilty of and fined substantial sums of money for serious misconduct including paying up with the largest health fraud settlement in US history. But Dawn Popple takes as true what GSK says compared to a doctor who with courage has reported publicly this problem with vaccine caused sudden deaths which GSK kept secret and reported in a disguised manner to the safety regulators.

CHS has reported on GSK’s problems with fraud and the like before. Here is an example:

GSK Fined US$3 BILLION – largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history

Remarkably, Popple claims this CHS article is by “an anti-vaccine advocate from Child Health Safety“. She has no information to support such a spurious claim and when CHS is pro-safety, democracy and informed and free choice. Popple it would seem is against.

Absent from the report is the issue that parents are told vaccines are entirely safe when they are not. Also absent from the report is the fact that vaccines are given to children the majority of whom especially in the western world are highly unlikely to suffer serious adverse effects of disease.

In other words normal healthy children are being given vaccines which can kill some of them who may never have a problem from the childhood diseases concerned, even if they caught them.

The report also fails to address the fact that no effective treatments for basic well-known longstanding childhood diseases have been developed. That is a scandal in the scientific 21st Century. If there were effective treatments vaccines would not be needed.

So not only will the public will not get balanced information, here you can see attacks against the dissemination of information via social media.

With mainstream media reporting about vaccination issues being successfully made a near blackout except for reports promoting vaccines, this article shows how the next targets are likely to be shutting down social media and the internet for people to get information about vaccine issues.

Here from the report is a dubious claim which contradicts and downplays under-reporting of adverse vaccine reactions:

"According to the statistics within the document, even if the doctor from Delhi’s fears are spot on, the risk of sudden death, while existent, would also be exceptionally rare after vaccination with the hexavalent Infanrix vaccine.”

Earlier in the report it refers to adverse vaccine reactions being under-reported but fails to explain how substantially under-reported they are. So the information in the GSK document represents a small fraction of the problems of adverse vaccine reactions.

And interestingly, this article, seemingly reviewing the GSK document and many other publications also has been written in a very short space of time when the material concerned is extensive and would require a very long time to consider it. It also contains no quotes from sources approached by the author, Dawn Popple, to support what she has written including the statements she makes as if of fact and the opinions she expresses [with no medical or scientific qualifications]. That is very poor journalism in our view.

The GSK document is 1271 pages alone. Journalists normally do not have that kind of time. This article is written by someone who describes her work as Independent Outsourced Freelance Writer, Freelance Writer, Social Media Marketer, Graphic Designer, Independent Contractor.

If you were to form the opinion that her publication http://www.inquisitr.com is trash journalism, you might be right and we would agree.


Link to study:
Combined hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine; Infanrix™ hexa: twelve years of experience in Italy.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014 Jan;10(1):129-37. doi: 10.4161/hv.26269. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004825#cm24004825_8656

GLYPHOSATE POISON BEING FED TO BABIES IN HOSPITALS - GLYPHOSATE DRAWS OUT THE VITAL NUTRIENTS OF ANY LIVING THING IT TOUCHES



Source Article:
Glyphosate detected in feeding tubes given to babies and children with cancer
http://www.naturalnews.com/048288_glyphosate_feeding_tubes_cancer_babies.html

(NaturalNews) An unthinkable, (although not entirely surprising), discovery has been made by a group called "Moms Across America," a coalition of mothers fighting to raise awareness and support regarding the dangers of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their associated pesticides.

Thanks to contributions provided by sponsors and private citizens, Moms Across America funded an experiment that tested feeding tube liquid used in a pediatric rehabilitation hospital where one of the group's supporters is employed.

To say the findings are alarming would be a severe understatement.

According to the results, 6 out of 20 (30 percent) samples of Pediasure, a supposed "nutritional" drink given to ill children in the pediatric unit, tested positive for unsafe levels of glyphosate.

Remember, glyphosate is the primary ingredient found in Monsanto's Roundup, and is also the most widely used weedkiller in the U.S. Glyphosate application has more than doubled in recent times, increasing from around 90 million pounds in 2001 to 185 million in 2007, according to statistics provided by the Pesticide Action Network (PAN).

The pesticide has been linked to toxicity in humans, resulting in cancer, reproductive and developmental complications and neurotoxicity. It's also been directly linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, as well as other serious health effects.


Moms Across America reports that Microbe Inotech, a lab in St. Louis, Missouri, tested Pediasure samples from the same batch, detecting glyphosate levels above 75 parts per billion (ppb) at 800 to 1,110 times higher than has previously been proven to destroy gut bacteria in chickens, or 0.1 ppb. Another study found that 50 parts per trillion (ppt) induced liver, kidney and sex hormone changes in rats.

"These samples were sent by a Moms Across America supporter.This [sic] is the exact brand used in the pediatric rehabilitation hospital where she worked and was fed patients needing tube feeding in critical care," reports a blog post by the group.

The post continues:

Moms Across America finds it appalling that our health care providers have been led to believe this feeding tube liquid is safe. Our children and loved ones who are depending on our health institutions to support their immune system and recovery. Instead they are being fed a liquid which scientists and knowledgeable care givers now believe is doing the exact opposite.

The Pediasure Enteral Nutritional Drink tested is loaded with GM corn syrup, soy, and sugar, which have been shown to cause inflammation, and are sprayed with gyphosate [sic] during the growing season and at harvest as a drying agent.


Glyphosate "draws out the vital nutrients of any living thing it touches"

The harm caused by glyphosate seems endless, as the chemical routinely disrupts most living processes. Studies conclude that Roundup -- in various forms -- acts as an endocrine disruptor, responsible for declining male reproductive health and sperm counts, according to GMFreeCymru.org. The rise in autism has also been attributed to increases in glyphosate application.

Food activists react

The controversial detection of glyphosate in feeding tubes being administered to sick children has many outraged. One popular food activist, Vani Hari, also known as "Food Babe," expressed her disgust in a comment on the group's findings.

This report is absolutely ground breaking for parents everywhere. We need to keep our children safe from these toxic chemicals. Our regulatory agencies have failed us and have let Roundup be carelessly used for too long. The worse part? The American public doesn't have the right to know which food doesn't have it. This must stop and is reason enough to avoid the use of any GMO technology that is tied to this chemical. -- Vani Hari, Food Babe

Sources:

http://www.beyondpesticides.org

http://www.panna.org

http://www.epa.gov[PDF]

http://www.momsacrossamerica.com

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net[PDF]

http://www.gmfreecymru.org

http://science.naturalnews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048288_glyphosate_feeding_tubes_cancer_babies.html#ixzz3P3H34j83


Friday, January 16, 2015

CIRCUMCISION ASSOCIATED WITH A 46% INCREASED RISK OF AUTISM -- LINKED TO ADHD TOO



Source Article:
Circumcision could raise the risk of autism
http://www.examiner.com/article/circumcision-could-raise-the-risk-of-autism

Circumcision before age five could double the risk

Research published in the the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine suggests that boys who undergo ritual circumcision may run a greater risk of developing autism before the age of 10 however, some experts disagree with these findings.
GoogleImages/www.fahadan.org

Approximately 55 percent to 65 percent of all newborn boys are circumcised in the United States each year. Routine circumcision is usually performed during the first 10 days (often within the first 48 hours), either in the hospital or, for some religious ritual circumcisions, at home.

Based on converging observations in animal, clinical and ecological studies, Dr. Morten Frisch, MD, PhD, DSc, consultant and senior investigator conducting epidemiological research at Statens Serum Institute, Adjunct professor of sexual health epidemiology at Aalborg University and lead author of this study along with Jacob Simonsen, Center for Sexology Research, Aalborg University, hypothesized a possible impact of ritual circumcision on the subsequent risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in young boys.

This study included 342,877 boys born between 1994 and 2003 and followed through the age of nine, and during the course of the study.

During the course of the study 4.986 of autism were diagnosed. The study showed that regardless of cultural background circumcised boys were more likely to develop autism. Being circumcised before age 10 was associated to a 46 percent increased risk But if circumcision took place before the age of five it doubled the risk.

Circumcised boys in non-Muslim families were also more likely to develop hyperkinetic disorder by 81 percent.

Dr. Frisch stated "Our investigation was prompted by the combination of recent animal findings linking a single painful injury to lifelong deficits in stress response and a study showing a strong, positive correlation between a country's neonatal male circumcision rate and its prevalence of ASD in boys."

Today it is considered unacceptable practice to circumcise boys without proper pain relief but none of the most common interventions used to reduce circumcision pain completely eliminates it and some boys will endure strongly painful circumcisions. The researchers say that the pain associated with circumcision in very young babies is likely to be more severe during the operation and post-operatively.

Painful experiences in neonates have been shown in animal and human studies to be associated with long-term alterations in pain perception, a characteristic often encountered among children with ASD.

Possible mechanisms linking early life pain and stress to an increased risk of neurodevelopmental, behavioral or psychological problems in later life remain incompletely conceptualized," said Dr. Frisch. "Given the widespread practice of non-therapeutic circumcision in infancy and childhood around the world, our findings should prompt other researchers to examine the possibility that circumcision trauma in infancy or early childhood might carry an increased risk of serious neurodevelopmental and psychological consequences."

There are experts however, that are urging caution about this study.

Professor Jeremy Turk. MD, BSc (Hons), FRCPsych, FRCPCH, DCH, Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist in the Trust’s Behavioural Phenotype Learning Disabilities Service and a Professor of Developmental Psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, related to the Daily Mail that while the findings of the study were “interesting,” they needed to be “considered carefully.”

“This is not a causal study, but instead compares data sets and looks for correlations. While this is a valid way of doing a study, it means that we must be careful about any implications,” he said. “For example, many cases of autism are missed until children are older and as there are relatively few cases of autism this could easily skew the data.”

'Furthermore, there are many potentially confounding variables which could explain raised ASD rates, which the authors do not explore or account for.

'Finally, I have some issues with the premise in that their speculations regarding early pain as a cause of autism are, to say the least, highly speculative.

Dr. Rosa Hoekstra, PhD, is a lecturer in The Open University's Science faculty had commented to the Daily Mail ‘I think this is an extremely speculative study. “She related that the study is based on registered data “and takes a registered autism diagnosis at face value, without considering cultural or social factors affecting the likelihood of an (early) autism diagnosis. “Even in a high income country like Denmark not all children with autism are detected and given a suitable autism diagnosis at an early age.”

Professor McConway, professor of applied statistics also with the Open University adds 'This study raises an interesting question, but one that cannot be fully answered with these data.'

Citations

Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys: national cohort study in Denmark. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2015; DOI: 10.1177/0141076814565942

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

MAJOR LIFE TRANSITION IS UNDER WAY -- I REALLY NEED YOUR SUPPORT

Dear friends - I am moving through a major life transition right now and I need to raise as much money as possible to make this happen with ease. If you have enjoyed reading this blog and/or have received benefit from the information I have shared on my TV or radio shows or in any venue, please, please, please consider making a donation today.


In lieu of a donation, perhaps you would consider pre-ordering a paperback copy of my new book, Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine: Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack Our Souls, today or purchasing the PDF now. The PDF is only $11.99. Paperback is $17.99 plus shipping. Check it out. This book is soooooo important.



Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine
Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack our Souls

stock huge

Photo by Tomasz Kobosz


Dear Friends -- I am pleased to announce the completion of my first book in which I expose the violence of western medicine, especially as it pertains to the systematic abuse of mothers and infants during hospital birth. The book, entitled "Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine," contains numerous personal stories of severe birth trauma combined with revelatory information about the cult of modern medicine, including the mind control of medical students who are forced to engage in atrocities in order to become official members of the cult.

The book also covers a wide array of topics including birth rape, circumcision, abuse in neonatal intensive care units, cesarean section, induction of labor, the dangers of drugs like cytotec, pitocin, and epidural anesthesia during labor, and even a section about the dark side of artificial reproductive technologies and the pain of IVF children. Additionally, the book also contains pertinent information concerning prenatal trauma and the impact of the first nine months on the rest of our lives.

This book is an intense read but the revelations presented are so important that I hope many people will read it.

I want to let you all know that there is a PDF version available right now for the low price of $11.99. If you'd like to read the book immediately and have a copy of it on your hard drive for future reference, the PDF version might be a good option for you. The book will be emailed to you within 24 hours of payment. You can get the PDF by ordering here...




FYI - I have just ordered the first copy of the book in paperback for proofing. Once it has been proofed, the paperback will be ready for publication and for sale at http://Amazon.com for $17.99 (plus shipping). If you would like to pre-order the paperback now, and receive the book directly from me rather than Amazon (they take a huge chunk of the money for the book), this would be helpful to me. As soon as the paperback copies are in my hand, I will mail your copy directly.

You can pre-order the paperback of the book by clicking on this link:






Also, if you would like to be kept informed about when the paperback becomes available and/or when my future books become available, please register in the sidebar to the right at the top of this page.

So far, I've gotten some really positive feedback about this book. Here’s what some people are saying:

I just read your book in a single reading. I couldn't stop reading it. Wow. This is very powerful…. I'm familiar with much of what you're explaining about medical abuse, but the way you put it together is so clear. I like the way that in telling your own story you're telling the story of what has happened to our entire culture. I hope this book reaches a lot of people. I'm going to read it again in a few days. I need to process some of my own feelings about this first. I think a lot of people are going to be very moved and impressed by what you've done with this book. Congratulations.
-- Kerth Barker, Author of "Angelic Defenders and Demonic Abusers"

WOW WOW WOW I just finished reading your book I could not stop reading your book. I read it in about two hours. This is an excellent book about birth trauma and it opens one's eyes to the medical field and how some doctors, nurses, midwifes really do not care… The imagery is incredible the poem is well written - more so because it is from your heart and your pain. I love the way you had a few pages before your book started of what you can do to make yourself feel better… I just love the layout of the book -- Mixing in stories with your take on it… As a volunteer of the Postpartum Resource Center I have read several books on PPD and a mom's journey thru it. And there are also many medical books explaining it. But I can honestly say yours is a different kind.
-- Geri O’Keefe, Author of "The Stork's Revenge: My Struggles and Triumphs over postpartum depression"

I have no words. Such a powerful book.. Wow. Wow. I know the cruelty of the birthing machine very well but you gave words to it in a wonderful way. It will open the eyes of many. Thank you for being you, for bringing this into the world, so so needed and necessary. Thank you for all the effort you put in this work, and helping women, men and babies to create a different world.
-- Eugenie van Ruitenbeek, Author or "Raising Children in an Insane World"

I love it! Fabulous format - a mixture of commentary, personal stories, citation of research, and gorgeous pictures. You're a true artist. It really couldn't be better. It felt like I was reading a feast for my mind and spirit.
-- Kay Bee

This book will have you clutching your own body as you recognize and understand how you have come to be. The author, having gone through the fire herself, has given us this tremendous visionary's gift. As a friend of mine said, 'Jeanice Barcelo has got to be one of the most perceptive people on the planet.' Jeanice lays out amazing, ground-breaking information, along with her own personal story -- an absolute MUST READ!
-- Sofia Smallstorm, Creator of "Unraveling Sandy Hook" and "From Chemtrails to Psuedo-Life: The Dark Agenda of Synthetic Biology

Hello Jeanice- I couldn't put your book down. Once I started, I went till the end... Thank you for the peek into the medical school indoctrination. I have for many years looked to the medical professionals, particularly doctors, as healing gods of some sort. This naive view gave way to anger and since your book, I realize that medical doctors are just like the rest of us being fed bullshit for truth -- building their lives on marshes of fecal rhetoric and subsisting for the material accouterments the pharma/insurance dollar bring.
Your book details the natural process of birth becoming a medical procedure. The emphasis has left the mother and child in favor of the efficient schedule of the doctor so he can get the most buck bang for his time. Not an easy read by any means, you detail one derailment of human nature after another! It is no longer a surprise that the global situation is completely out of balance, frighteningly headed toward man made extinction- it seems to have been the idea from the beginning of hospital birth.
Thank you, Jeanice, you work is invaluable.

-- Joan Callahan

Pre-publication PDF Version Available Now

To purchase the PDF version for the low price of $11.99, simply click on the following link. Your book will be sent to the email address you use to make the purchase.




LEAVING BABIES TO SLEEP ALONE CAN CAUSE HIGH STRESS, BRAIN DAMAGE, DIFFICULTY BONDING, AND DIFFICULTY FORMING HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS LATER IN LIFE



Dr. Nils Bergman, founder of Kangaroo Mother Care in South Africa, has shared enormous wisdom with the birthing community and the world regarding the benefits of skin to skin contact and the harm being done by separating babies from their mothers during early life. This separation can come in the form of placing babies in NICUs and/or incubators, swaddling babies, or forcing babies to sleep alone. Everything this doctor says is absolute common sense, though many have lost a connection with their true nature so the knowing of how to nurture their young does not come naturally to them.

Also, sudden infant death syndrome is caused by vaccines, not co-sleeping.

Source Article:
Bad news for dads: Babies 'should share mother's bed until age three' because it's good for their hearts
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2054393/Bad-news-dads-Babies-share-mothers-bed-age-good-hearts.html

Sleeping alone makes it 'harder for mother and child to bond and damages the development of the brain'

Researchers believe this lead to bad behaviour as the child grows up


Babies should sleep in their mother’s bed until they are at least three years old, it was claimed last night.

The controversial advice comes from a paediatrician who found that two-day-old babies who were placed in cots slept less well than those who dozed on their mother’s chest.

Their hearts were also under more stress, it was claimed.

Sleeping alone makes it harder for mother and child to bond - and damages the development of the brain, leading to bad behaviour as the child grows up, researchers fear.

Dr Nils Bergman, of the University of Cape Town, South Africa, says that for optimal development, healthy newborns should sleep on their mother’s chest for the first few weeks

After that, they should stay in the mother’s bed until they are three or even four years old.

However, studies linking bed-sharing with an increased risk of cot death and fears that a mother will roll over and smother her child means that women are generally advised against this.

In a recent British study of sudden infant deaths, almost two-thirds of those that were unexplained occurred when the bed was being shared.

But Dr Bergman said: ‘When babies are smothered and suffer cot deaths, it is not because their mother is present. It is because of other things: toxic fumes, cigarettes, alcohol, big pillows and dangerous toys.’

Sixteen infants were studied while they slept on their mother’s chest and in a cot by her bed. Monitoring revealed the baby’s heart to be under three times as much stress when he or she slept alone.

Being in a cot also disrupted sleep, with the babies’ brains less likely to ‘cycle’ or make the transition between two types of sleep called active and quiet.

In the cots, only six out of the 16 had any quiet sleep and its quality was far worse.

Making this transition is thought to be key to the normal development of the brain.

Animal studies have linked the combination of stress and lack of sleep to behavioural problems in teenage years.

Dr Bergman said that changes to the brain brought on by stress hormones may make it more difficult to form relationships later on, leading to problems such as promiscuity.

The National Childbirth Trust is in favour of bed-sharing, as long as the parents have not been smoking, drinking or using drugs and are not obese, ill or excessively tired.

Professor George Haycock of the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths, said: ‘Our position as a foundation is that we owe it to the public to recommend that the safest place is in a cot in the parents’ room.’

HEAVY CELL PHONE USE CAN QUADRUPLE YOUR RISK OF DEADLY BRAIN CANCER



Source Article By Dr. Mercola:
Heavy Cell Phone Use Can Quadruple Your Risk of Deadly Brain Cancer
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/01/06/cell-phone-use-brain-cancer-risk.aspx?e_cid=20150106Z1_DNL_Buyer_art_1&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20150106Z1-Buyer&et_cid=DM66261&et_rid=794994994

No one wants to hear that something as “indispensable” as your cell phone might cause grave harm to your health, but that’s exactly what mounting evidence tells us we’re faced with.

Wireless phones and other gadgets have the potential to cause all sorts of health problems, from headaches to brain tumors. The link between brain cancer and cell phone use has been a particularly persistent one, and mounting research has only made this association stronger...

As mentioned in the featured video, previous research has shown that those who begin using cell phones heavily before age 20 have four to five times more brain cancer by their late 20s, compared to those whose exposure is minimal.

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), declared cell phones a Class B Carcinogen, meaning a “possible cancer-causing agent,” based on the available research.

This places cell phones in the same category as diesel engine exhaust, some pesticides, and some heavy metals. The expert panel ruled that there was “some evidence” that regular cell phone use increased the risk of two types of tumors – brain tumors (gliomas) and acoustic neuromas.

When you consider the fact that your body is bioelectric, it’s easier to understand how and why biological damage from wireless phones might occur.1

For starters, your body uses electrons to communicate, and inside every cell are mitochondria, the “power plants” of the cell, and these mitochondria can be adversely impacted by electromagnetic fields, resulting in cellular dysfunction. Other mechanisms of harm have also been discovered in recent years.

Wireless Phone Use Increases Risk of Malignant Brain Tumor

The latest analysis,2, 3 published online ahead of print in October, was performed by Dr. Lennart Hardell, a professor of oncology at University of Örebro in Sweden, and statistician Michael Carlberg from the same University.

The pair looked at data from two previous case-controlled studies on Swedish patients diagnosed with malignant brain tumors during the periods of 1997-2003 and 2007-2009.

The patients were between the ages of 18 and 80 years old at the time of their diagnosis. Cell phone use was ascertained via questionnaires. (Use of a hands-free device counted as non-exposure.) In all, nearly 1,500 brain cancer patients were included, along with 3,530 cancer-free controls.

Using regression analysis, adjusted for gender, age, year of diagnosis, and socioeconomic index, the odds of developing a malignant and highly lethal brain cancer called glioma rose concurrently with increased cell phone use.

The more hours spent with a cell phone pressed to their ear, and the more years they’d spent using a mobile phone, the higher the odds were.

Those who logged the most amount of hours on their cell phones were twice as likely to develop glioma compared to those who used them the least

Those who used either a cell phone or cordless house phone for more than 25 years had triple the risk of glioma, compared to those who had used wireless telephones for less than one year

To put this risk ratio into some perspective, just over five people out of 100,000 were diagnosed with malignant brain cancer between 1995 and 2002. If that rate triples, the odds of developing a malignant brain tumor rise to about 16 out of 100,000.

But, there are also signs that technology is progressively getting more harmful—not less so... As noted in the featured article:4

“The case control studies covered periods during which phone technologies had changed considerably. It started with first generation analogue phones that had an output power of 1 W at about 900 MHz.

The 2nd generation GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication) phones (2G) with either 900 or 1800 MHz frequency had pulsed output power averaging tens of mW.

The 3rd generation (3G) phones UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System) are more amplitude modulated than pulsed, and typically use a broad frequency band (5 MHz width) from 700-3 590 MHz on a worldwide basis, and from 900-2 170 MHz in Europe with output power of the order of tens of μW.”


The findings show that 3G phones may cause more harm than earlier versions, raising the risk of brain cancer four-fold. It also appears to have shorter latency period—just five to 10 years, compared to about 25 years for earlier mobile phone versions.

Proposed Mechanisms of Harm

One mechanism of harm, published in 2010,5 explains how electromagnetic fields damage your cells and DNA by inducing a cellular stress response. The research was conducted by Dr. Martin Blank,6 PhD, a former Associate Professor at Columbia University in the department of physiology and cellular biophysics, and past president of the Bioelectromagnetics Society.

He gave an informative speech at the November 18, 2010 Commonwealth Club of California program, "The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields," co-sponsored by ElectromagneticHealth.org.

In his lecture, Dr. Blank explained that DNA, with its “coil of coils” structure, is very vulnerable to electromagnetic fields. It possesses the same structural characteristics of a fractal antenna (electronic conduction and self-symmetry), and these two properties allow for greater reactivity of DNA to electromagnetic fields than other tissues.

Moreover, no heat is required for this DNA damage to occur. Dr. Blank believes the potential harm of wireless technologies can be significant, and that there’s plenty of peer-reviewed research to back up such suspicions.

A review of 11 long-term epidemiologic studies published in the journal Surgical Neurology7 in 2009 revealed that using a cell phone for 10 years or longer approximately doubles your risk of being diagnosed with a brain tumor on the same side of the head where the cell phone is typically held. Both Dr. Hardell and Carlberg were involved in that study as well, and these findings are very similar to the findings in their latest review, discussed earlier.

Another important study, funded by the US government, was published in JAMA8, 9 in 2011. Using a specialized brain scanner capable of detecting alterations in glucose, the researchers determined that cell phone radiation triggers your brain cells to metabolize glucose at an increased rate. Glucose metabolism equates to cell activation, so the findings indicate that radiation from your cell phone has a well-defined measureable influence on your brain. Essentially, each time you put a cell phone up to your ear, you’re artificially activating your brain cells. While that much is clear, it’s still unknown whether this excess glucose production is harmful, or can cause a cascade of problems down the line.

Common-Sense Guidelines to Protect Your and Your Family’s Health

It’s important to note that researchers are in general agreement that there’s a latency period of about 10 years or more before the damage shows up, which places children at greatest risk—a risk that is potentially exacerbated with more modern 3G technologies, which appear to be even more harmful than earlier versions.

From my perspective, the evidence clearly indicates that we need to invoke the precautionary principle with regards to cell phone use, as well as other wireless technologies. Until the industry starts taking this matter seriously, the responsibility to keep children safe falls on the parents. To minimize the risk to your brain, and that of your child, pay heed to the following advice:

* Don’t let your child use a cell phone. Barring a life-threatening emergency, children should not use a cell phone, or a wireless device of any type. Children are far more vulnerable to cell phone radiation than adults, because of their thinner skull bones.

* Keep your cell phone use to a minimum. Turn your cell phone off more often. Reserve it for emergencies or important matters. As long as your cell phone is on, it emits radiation intermittently, even when you are not actually making a call. Use a land line at home and at work.

* Reduce or eliminate your use of other wireless devices. Just as with cell phones, it is important to ask yourself whether or not you really need to use them every single time. If you must use a portable home phone, use the older kind that operates at 900 MHz. They are no safer during calls, but at least some of them do not broadcast constantly even when no call is being made. Note the only way to truly be sure if there is an exposure from your cordless phone is to measure with an electrosmog meter, and it must be one that goes up to the frequency of your portable phone (so old meters won’t help much). As many portable phones are 5.8 Gigahertz, we recommend you look for RF meters that go up to 8 Gigahertz.

You can find RF meters at www.EMFSafetyStore.com. Even without an RF meter, you can be fairly certain your portable phone is problematic if the technology is labeled DECT, or digitally enhanced cordless technology. Alternatively, you can be very careful with the base station placement as that causes the bulk of the problem since it transmits signals 24/7, even when you aren't talking. If you can keep the base station at least three rooms away from where you spend most of your time, and especially your bedroom, they may not be as damaging to your health. Ideally it would be helpful to turn off or disconnect your base station every night before you go to bed.

* Limit cell phone use to areas with excellent reception. The weaker the reception, the more power your phone must use to transmit, and the more power it uses, the more radiation it emits, and the deeper the dangerous radio waves penetrate into your body. Ideally, you should only use your phone with full bars and good reception.

* Avoid carrying your cell phone on your body, and do not sleep with it below your pillow or near your head. Ideally, put it in your purse or carrying bag. Placing a cell phone in your bra or in a shirt pocket over your heart is asking for trouble, as is placing it in a man's pocket if he seeks to preserve his fertility. The most dangerous place to be, in terms of radiation exposure, is within about six inches of the emitting antenna. You do not want any part of your body within that area while the phone is on.

Don't assume one cell phone is safer than another. There's no such thing as a "safe" cell phone.

* Respect others; many are highly sensitive to EMF. Some people who have become sensitive can feel the effects of others' cell phones in the same room, even when it is on but not being used. If you are in a meeting, on public transportation, in a courtroom or other public places, such as a doctor's office, keep your cell phone turned off out of consideration for the “secondhand radiation” effects. Children are also more vulnerable, so please avoid using your cell phone near children.

* Use a well-shielded wired headset: Wired headsets will certainly allow you to keep the cell phone farther away from your body. However, if a wired headset is not well-shielded -- and most of them are not -- the wire itself can act as an antenna attracting and transmitting radiation directly to your brain. So make sure the wire used to transmit the signal to your ear is shielded. One of the best kinds of headsets use a combination of shielded wire and air-tube. These operate like a stethoscope, transmitting the sound to your head as an actual sound wave; although there are wires that still must be shielded, there is no wire that goes all the way up to your head.

FLU VACCINE CAUSES 5.5 TIMES MORE RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS: STUDY



Source Article:
Flu Vaccine Causes 5.5 Times More Respiratory Infections: Study
http://yournewswire.com/flu-vaccine-causes-5-5-times-more-respiratory-infections-study/


Study: Flu Vaccine Causes 5.5 Times More Respiratory Infections – A True Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Study

Would you be interested in a vaccination that results in more than 5 times as much illness? If you take the seasonal influenza vaccination, that’s what you’re doing. The seasonal trivalent flu vaccine results in 5.5 times more incidents of respiratory illness, according to a study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases.

The study is particularly noteworthy because it was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial—and the researchers used saline solution, a genuinely inactive placebo, as a stand in for the trivalent flu vaccine. Most vaccine trials utilize active placebos, which are substances that include ingredients used in the vaccines, making the studies meaningless—though this fact is almost never revealed in the writeups.

Subjects were followed for an average of 272 days. The active influenza vaccine adminstered was Sanofi Pasteur’s Vaxigrip. The trial included children aged 6-15 years. 69 were given Vaxgrip and 46 received the saline placebo.

With regard to effectiveness against influenza, the authors wrote:

There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of confirmed seasonal influenza infection between recipients of TIV [trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine] or placebo.

The flu vaccine provided no benefit!

The authors tried to cover that by adding:

TIV recipients had significantly lower risk of seasonal influenza infection based on serologic evidence.

In other words, the authors are trying to suggest that, in spite of the fact that vaccine recipients suffered as much genuine influenza as those who’d received a placebo, they still benefited because of “serologic evidence”. This “serologic evidence” consists of antibodies produced as a result of the vaccine, which is the standard method of determining a vaccine’s effectiveness.

In other words, a vaccine’s effectiveness is not determined by whether it prevents disease, but rather by whether it causes antibodies to be produced!

But the story is even worse than this. The study also demonstrated that the vaccine resulted in recipients having 5.5 times more respiratory illness. Here’s a partial breakdown of their results:

Vaccinated vs. Placebo(saline):

Any Seasonal Influenza - 58/88
H1N1 (Swine Flu ‘Pandemic’)- 58/0
Total Influenza Cases - 116/88

Noninfluenza Viruses

Rhinovirus (common cold)- 230/59
Coxsackie/Echovirus - 160/0
Other Respiratory Viruses - 97/29
Total Other Viruses - 487/88

As you can see, even though the authors claim that there was no distinction in cases of influenza between the subjects who received a vaccine and those who received the placebo, the reality seems to be quite different: There were a total of 116 influenza cases in the vaccinated group and 88 in the placebo group.

The authors play with statistics in this study by using assumptions about whether people actually had diseases, because there were many reported instances that couldn’t be verified. They came up with a relative risk of 4.4. In any case, relative risk is actually a meaningless statistic here, because it requires that exposure to the causative agent be known, which it clearly wasn’t in this study.

I prefer a simpler, more straightforward—and, I believe, more honest—approach of simply comparing the numbers of cases of disease. Doing that, we get 487 ÷ 88, which tells us that those who were vaccinated were 5.5 times more likely to contract a confirmed respiratory illness!

Now, let’s take a look at the other respiratory illnesses that people were more likely to contract as a result of being vaccinated for influenza. The rhinovirus is the common cold, so it isn’t a big deal. However, coxsackievirus and echovirus are quite different. Both of them are known to cause meningitis, paralysis, hepatitis, and heart disorders. This is not common, but the same thing is true of poliovirus. It also causes a usually minor respiratory illness, but in rare cases can result in much the same harm that coxsackievirus and echovirus can.

It is, therefore, reasonable to suggest that the rate of severe crippling diseases may also be increased by the influenza vaccine, and potentially by any vaccine against a respiratory illness.

Implications

This study’s implications are quite serious. The authors suggest:

Receipt of TIV could increase influenza immunity at the expense of reduced immunity to
noninfluenza respiratory viruses, by some unknown biological mechanism. Alternatively, our results could be explained by temporary nonspecific immunity after influenza virus infection, through the cell-mediated response or, more likely, the innate immune response to infection.

In other words, the act of injecting antigens probably damages the innate cell-mediated immune response, the part of the immune system that protects without the need of resorting to development of antibodies. They go on to state:

The phenomenon of virus interference has been well known in virology for >60 years.

The interference of vaccinations with the innate cell-mediated immune response is well known! The authors go on to cite several sources supporting this fact.

In summary, this study demonstrates:

Influenza vaccines provide no benefit.
Influenza vaccines cause a hugely increased number of respiratory illnesses.
Influenza vaccines—and very likely other vaccines—harm the innate cell-mediated immune response, which results in a significant increase in infectious disease incidents.

Nonetheless, our agencies of health destruction, such as the US’s alphabet soup of FDA, CDC, and NIH, the UK’s NHS, MHRA, and DOH, Australia’s ANPHA, and Canada’s Health Canada, plus the international WHO and massive foundations such as the Gates Foundation and GAVI—these and so many more routinely lie about the reality of vaccinations. They use fear tactics and lies to promote the profiteering of Big Pharma and Big Medicine at the expense of the populace, and worse, of our children.

The reality of all these agencies is that, though they may have been created for the purpose of benefiting our health, they’ve been co-opted by Big Pharma and Big Medicine, who have managed to buy their way into them. The result is that these agencies now actively promote, and even enforce, the use of products and methods whose first purpose is to make profits. If that means the public’s health must suffer … apparently, it’s a small price to pay when it doesn’t affect the bottom line.
Sources:

Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine; Clinical Infectious Diseases; Benjamin J. Cowling, Vicky J. Fang, Hiroshi Nishiura,
Kwok-Hung Chan, Sophia Ng, Dennis K. M.lp, Susan S. Chiu, Gabriel M. Leung} and J. S. Malik Peir; DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis307

Article By by Heidi Stevenson /Gaia Health

Original Article Here: http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2013-06-02/flu-vax-causes-5-5-times-more-respiratory-infections/

Via Health Impact News

Saturday, January 10, 2015

*** MEDICAL MONSTERS TURN JOY INTO HORROR *** JOHN KAMINSKI'S REVIEW OF "BIRTH TRAUMA AND THE DARK SIDE OF MODERN MEDICINE"


Photo: Marcin Okupniak, Dreamstime.com

Greedy doctors' focus on profit destroys mother-child bonding

A review of
Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine
Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack Our Souls

By Jeanice Barcelo, M.A.,
http://birthofanewearth.com


By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.org/en/kaminski

Is the world going mad and are people a lot more unhappy than they should be because of the barbaric way doctors treat mothers when they deliver their babies?

Jeanice Barcelo's gut wrenching indictment of the way hospitals and doctors brutally manipulate pregnant mothers in Birth Trauma, and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, Exposing the Systematic Violence Against Women and Infants During Hospital Birth insists this interference in the mother/child bond is a key element in the breakdown of human love worldwide.

The medical profession has its own rules about delivering babies, and the way Barcelo tells it, these methods not only create lasting scars in mothers, destroy many marriages and unnecessarily injure and kill children. They also leave a great uninvestigated tragedy of infants who do not properly bond with their mothers as a result of medical expedience more interested in profitable procedures than in healthy children.

Its effect on the world — but most especially on women and children, she insists — is catastrophic.

Ordinary readers, especially men brave enough to tackle the subject, will view with unadulterated horror the things that are done to babies in the name of keeping them healthy. Like screwing fetal heart monitors into their skulls. Or memory block drugs used for a variety of purposes including sexual molestation.

"Doctors don't care if mom and the baby are damaged"

Barcelo calls this birth trauma a hidden epidemic, and cites a 1995 study that determined 95 percent of all births in the U.S. were considered traumatic, 45% severely traumatic. The Centers for Disease Control, she says, are responsible for causing the deaths of thousands of unborn babies, because vaccinations cause a massive spike in fetal deaths.

An increasing number of birthing mothers recall their experiences as "birth rape", and following the extreme level of abuse they receive in hospitals, post traumatic stress afflicts many of them.

The level of malfeasance Barcelo itemizes in her examples of women giving birth reveals a glossary of horrors facing every woman who plans to have her baby delivered in a hospital.

The most magic moment of every mother's life is turned into a nightmare by cash conscious doctors who misuse drugs not meant for childbirth to trigger induction — forcibly ejecting babies from the womb at the profound cost of severing the psychological bond between mother and child and predisposing that child to both afflictions and addictions later in life that need not otherwise occur.

The cost to society is extraordinary, tragic and mostly unacknowledged, the author stresses.

"The core of our pain starts at childbirth. It's about our own mothers handing over their power" to a conscienceless machine that rings babies through a medical cash register which simply doesn't treat them as the supremely sensitive and vulnerable human beings they are.

"They are birthing babies in violence and leaving infants alone at the gate in nurseries of horror, all done for power and gain.

"Knock 'em out and pull 'em out — it has all the elements of rape," says Barcelo, who herself has experienced five traumatic pregnancies that provided her with firsthand knowledge of how this miracle of birth is turned into a nightmare by the heavy handed processes used in for-profit hospitals.

Central to the tragedy is the use of epidural drugs, which accelerate the birth process. These cut off mothers' conscious contact with their babies and not only deprive them of the most special moments of their lives as mothers, but sabotage the bond with their child for life.

'Pit to distress'

Barcelo cites two main drugs as the major culprits in ruining the birth experience: cytotec (an ulcer drug) and pitocin, neither of which are recommended for use in labor but are widely used to hasten the contrived necessity of Cesarean section surgeries.

"We have the highest C-Section rate in the world because these drugs cut off oxygen to the babies and disrupt bonding and breastfeeding. Both drugs are linked to oxycodone addiction late in life as well as autism."

The use of pitocin, Barcelo explains, is often referred to as "pit to distress", or to deliberately put the baby in danger to more quickly necessitate the C-section option, which many mothers describe as not giving birth at all, but to having their baby stolen from them.

Also hair trigger decisions to abandon efforts to keep babies alive in Barcelo's experience are really often fictitious brain death diagnoses that enable lucrative organ harvesting.

And the damage is not only to mother and child, but also to fathers, as it was for one dad who "lost my connection to my wife that I never regained" for what was perceived as failure to protect his wife when doctors induced a C-section without parental permission. The PTSD that often comes with trauma not only afflicts babies and their mothers, but also distraught dads.

But the pain of accelerating the birth process is more than emotional, as the testimony of a mother who tried to give birth at home but was forced to call paramedics vividly attests. Doctors routinely inject paralytic drugs but often don't use anesthetics on patients they don't like to punish them for being recalcitrant. One woman Barcelo quotes describes how she was given an incredibly painful C-section without anesthesia, but being paralyzed, was unable to protest.

"The torture of infants and mothers happens regularly," Barcelo writes matter-of-factly.

Bowels of the technological underworld

Barcelo writes:

"Worst of all in the fact that C-sectioned babies often end up in neonatal intensive care units, and those born before 39 weeks are twice as likely as those born vaginally to be kept in a NICU due to respiratory distress. Once a baby ends up in the NICU, the possibility for healthy bonding is further degraded.

"NICUs are like the bowels of the technological underworld. They are places where infants are literally held captive for weeks and months, and subjected to all manner of painful and tortuous medical procedures, most of the time without being given any kind of pain relief whatsoever."

Once a baby gets into an NICU, she is subjected to 14 to 21 invasive procedures per day, all without anesthesia, and the parents have no say over the treatment, nor can they remove their child from the NICU. The experience of pain, Barcelo writes, completely changes the wiring of the brain in adulthood.

The story of Andrew and his five months of torture plus his $100,000 medical bill that preceded his death will curl your toenails, guaranteed.

"Babies are being used for medical experiments," Barcelo writes. One government study that included data from Wake Forest and Yale universities involved deliberately depriving babies of oxygen to observe the results, which very often was death.

Barcelo reserves special scorn for the use of ultrasound frequencies, which are extremely dangerous to babies. "To me," Barcelo writes, "this indicates a distinct level of evil within the medical profession. It is a clear indication that they are willing and able to deliberately cause harm."

The lie that babies don't feel pain

Of all of the horrific descriptions Barcelo has put forth in her descriptions of the barbaric birth process, the one that rattled this reviewer the most was the widespread practice of medical procedures on babies based on the principle that babies do not feel pain.

A woman demanded to see hospital records after her son's death in 1985. She said, 'Somehow it was possible for professionals who perceived a baby as too fragile to tolerate general anesthesia to perceive that same infant as able to withstand open-chest surgery without pain relief. . . .' At two weeks (old), during his hour and half operation, Jeffrey had two holes cut on either side of his neck and one in his chest, he was cut from his breastbone around to his backbone, his flesh lifted aside, ribs pried apart, blood vessels tied off and lungs retreated, tissue stitched together and a 'stab incision' to secure chest tubes. He died a few days later as a result of the shock that overwhelmed his entire system causing his brain to bleed and his organs to fail. The hospital's senior neonatologist responded to his mother's inquiries by stating 'it didn't matter because he was a fetus,' explaining that children less than 2 years of age do not feel pain . . .

"Such is the arrogance and extreme insanity of esteemed members of the medical profession who have continued to insist for more than 100 years that babies do not feel pain," Barcelo writes.

She also is on top of the latest bogus claim by the CDC that infant circumcision will prevent HIV when an avalanche of medical research claims the opposite. Barcelo blames the CDC pronouncement on "a well orchestrated media campaign by the Jews" that enables doctors to continue the most common surgery in America be performed on babies without anesthesia.

Even disregarding the savage practice of Jewish rabbis, studies have shown that ordinary circumcision trauma lasts a lifetime.

In addition, African countries have the highest rate of circumcision and the highest rate of HIV. And in Norway, the only country that records the circumcision status of rapists, the 2 percent of the population who are circumcised commit 80 percent of the rapes.

So how does the medical system do it? How do they turn good and decent people into biological robots who parrot nonsense and can't seem to think for themselves? The answer lies in the indoctrination process is set-up to systematically break down the morality and the will of medical students, and, if all goes according to plan, will cause a split in their psyche that will result in dissociation and the assimilation of an alter personality that will be willing to conform to medical norms.

The horrors in these satanic birth factories seem to go on forever.

• Cells from aborted babies are also being used for "flavor enhancing research" by companies like Senomyx and residue from aborted babies can be found in products made by Pepsi, Nestle, Kraft, and Campbell, all of whom have hired Senomyx to do their "flavor enhancing research".

• Israel is on the cutting edge of this Luciferian technology and it is involved in something called "post mortem sperm retrieval," which involves harvesting sperm from dead men.

And lastly,

According to Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year neonatologist exposing the dark side of organ donation, "brain death" is a completely fictitious diagnosis conjured up by the underworld demigods for purposes of finding a way to legalize the harvesting of organs while people are still very much alive. Organ donation in the U.S. is an extremely dark business, with living people being wheeled into operating rooms and having their chests cleaved open and their organs removed one at a time at the hands of medical sadists . . . The organ removal is done without anesthesia in the U.S., but with the victims instead being given paralysis drugs so that they cannot move or scream while they are being tortured and murdered by medical doctors.

"Many people now allege that the CDC's real purpose is genocide and depopulation, and that vaccines are biological weapons purposefully being used to create mass sterilization, disease and death. These programs are being used to deliberately depopulate the Earth, Barcelo insists, pointing out the chart on www.deagel.com that forecasts a drop in the U.S. population from 316 million to 69 million by 2025."

Jeanice Barcelo comes through a tragic lineage of the haunted womb, from a mother and grandmother who never bonded with their children. In reporting that 75% of mothers have received an epidural during labor prior to birthing their children, she is in a sad majority of children who did not receive the love they should have when they first appeared in the world.

That means that three quarters of the children who are born in this country do not receive the optimum amount of love from their mothers that they rightfully should, and looking at the world around us, the sad result of that tragedy is all too clear.

For more information about or to purchase a copy of Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, go to http://birthofanewearth.com.


John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.org/en/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040323232319/http://johnkaminski.com/



To learn more about Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine: Exposing Systematic Violence During Hospital Birth and the Attempt to Hijack Our Souls, go here


To pre-order the paperback click here. Paperback is $17.99 plus shipping.








To purchase the book in PDF form for $11.99, simply click on the following link. Your book will be sent to the email address you use to make the purchase.